devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: unittest: unflatten device tree on UML when testing
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:35:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcb92f73-f49b-03b8-32ca-ee89b962a765@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eabdd156-62f4-fadb-bfa4-ecbb5ba65527@gmail.com>

On 2/15/19 6:18 PM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 2/15/19 4:46 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
>> UML supports enabling OF, and is useful for running the device tree
>> tests, so add support for unflattening device tree blobs so we can
>> actually use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/of/unittest.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> index 84427384654d5..6de34d5fa0e85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
>> @@ -2527,6 +2527,9 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
>>  	}
>>  	of_node_put(np);
>>  
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML))
>> +		unittest_unflatten_overlay_base();
>> +
> 
> This is still the wrong location.  It should be at the top of the function.
> 
> I'll try moving it to the top and see if it still works -- should only
> take me a few minutes.

Yep, see below.


> -Frank
> 
>>  	pr_info("start of unittest - you will see error messages\n");
>>  	of_unittest_check_tree_linkage();
>>  	of_unittest_check_phandles();
>>
> 
> 

This is probably white space damaged because I used cut and paste,
but this is what I meant above.

Tested on 5.0-rc3.

Applied patches 1-14 of series:

   [RFC v4 00/17] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework

booted uml, saw the expected 219 pass, 1 fail.

Applied the following patch, saw the expected 224 pass, 0 fail.

I did not apply patch 15 of the other series, but applying patch 15
should still result in errors on boot, as I reported in the mail
thread for that patch series.

---
 drivers/of/unittest.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Index: b/drivers/of/unittest.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -2514,6 +2514,10 @@ static int __init of_unittest(void)
 	int res;
 
 	/* adding data for unittest */
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UML))
+		unittest_unflatten_overlay_base();
+
 	res = unittest_data_add();
 	if (res)
 		return res;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-16  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-16  0:46 [PATCH v2] of: unittest: unflatten device tree on UML when testing Brendan Higgins
2019-02-16  2:18 ` Frank Rowand
2019-02-16  2:35   ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2019-02-19 23:38     ` Brendan Higgins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcb92f73-f49b-03b8-32ca-ee89b962a765@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).