From: "Stefan Dösinger" <stefandoesinger@gmail.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lee@kernel.org,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
olteanv@gmail.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/12] dt-bindings: clk: zte: Add zx297520v3 top clock and reset controller
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:49:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gypuIvsORyye1Tbviu_vVQ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810153805.GA1793660-robh@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]
Am Montag, 10. August 2026, 18:38:05 Ostafrikanische Zeit schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 07:12:23AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
> > issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] Missing `resets` property definition in
> > the YAML schema. - [Medium] Missing `simple-mfd` in compatible string
> > list for syscon with children.
> Neither of these look valid to me.
Yeah, I removed the resets property in response to Krzysztof's feedback [0].
And the syscon-reboot is registered by the MFD driver, which in turn goes back
to Conor's suggestion at [1].
Should I reply to the list when I think Sashiko produced a false warning? In a
way it feels like fighting windmills, as it will likely bring up the same
warning for further patch revisions.
It does find a lot of real problems though and as a newbie contributor I feel
like it is a valuable tool.
Cheers,
Stefan
0: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20260717-uncovered-feathered-groundhog-eab16e@quoll/
1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20260617-deed-snap-4649ffae0e27@spud/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 870 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 21:28 [PATCH v10 00/12] ZTE zx297520v3 clock bindings and driver Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 01/12] dt-bindings: clk: zte: Add zx297520v3 top clock and reset controller Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 15:38 ` Rob Herring
2026-08-10 18:49 ` Stefan Dösinger [this message]
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 02/12] dt-bindings: clk: zte: Add zx297520v3 matrix " Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 03/12] dt-bindings: clk: zte: Add zx297520v3 LSP " Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 04/12] mfd: zx297520v3: Add a clock and reset MFD driver Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 05/12] clk: zte: Add Clock registration infrastructure Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 21:47 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 06/12] clk: zte: Add regmap-based clocks Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 07/12] clk: zte: Add zx PLL support infrastructure Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 21:56 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 08/12] clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 top clocks Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 21:58 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 09/12] clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 matrix clocks Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 21:59 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 10/12] clk: zte: Introduce a driver for zx297520v3 LSP clocks Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 21:59 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-09 21:28 ` [PATCH v10 11/12] reset: zte: Add a zx297520v3 reset driver Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 7:03 ` [PATCH v10 12/12] ARM: dts: zte: Declare zx297520v3 CRM device nodes Stefan Dösinger
2026-08-10 7:11 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=gypuIvsORyye1Tbviu_vVQ@gmail.com \
--to=stefandoesinger@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox