From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/2] 5200/mpc: improve i2c bus error recovery Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100505220916.GD3529@ovro.caltech.edu> <1273168472.1767.1@antares> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1273168472.1767.1@antares> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Albrecht_Dre=DF?= Cc: Linux PPC Development , Devicetree Discussions , "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" , "Ira W. Snyder" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Albrecht Dre=DF w= rote: > Am 06.05.10 00:09 schrieb(en) Ira W. Snyder: >> >> Did this series get forgotten about? I don't see it in bjdook's next-i2c >> branch or in benh's next branch. > > It's not in Grant's 5xxx tree either - as it's specific for those > processors, I think he might be the responsible person. =A0The patch is s= till > in a "new" state in patchwork, btw. > >> I've pulled these into my 2.6.31.13 kernel, and they seem to work fine. >> You've got my Tested-by if you didn't get one from me already. > > Tanks a lot! > > I think, though, the whole stuff has been discussed in depth in February,= so > I do not understand why it's still pending as "new". =A0Grant, did we miss > something here? I generally let subsystem maintainers pick up the device driver patches for embedded platforms I'm responsible for unless I'm asked to do otherwise. I think ben has asked me to take these through my tree. g.