From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Monnier Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] simplefb: Change simplefb_init from module_init to fs_initcall Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:13:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1415830124-28787-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1415830124-28787-3-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20141113085238.GE20972@lukather> <546478B5.2040002@redhat.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Like a lot of things, if it is made a modules, and it breaks for the > user, the user gets to keep the pieces. There are potentially some But the option's description should probably include some blurb about the fact that it only works as a module with some combinations of SoC+kernel. Stefan