From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:31:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1314731837-6985-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B3279E01@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B3279E01-C7FfzLzN0UxDw2glCA4ptUEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> (Stephen Warren's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:26:16 -0700") Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Grant Likely , Olof Johansson , Shawn Guo , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Aug 30 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing Tegra's > SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date; it relies > on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without patch 3, > the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode instead of > 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even notice 8-bit > support was missing... Ah, okay. I've merged patch 2 to mmc-next for 3.2, then, and will keep an eye on what happens with the arch patches. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child