From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EE4483BF2; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 10:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791370728; cv=none; b=SWp8Nw4KzP+OUxXfOhlYdhOIblU2yA5y+kL04wmhldnw8MfhxqhPhJ+lNpsSUb50VRIAVttm8sgTJMwN4LngSJDdvCMBe3tpsotdEzzL1yLn2m/JA8zMCs9itZYGC78qgAqPaZJqvZ44ejOWM/gIeKinjDMOsFlLDR18kw0naY4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791370728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QFXIXB99Hc4xAfCNIJmNcvK6MG8czMABWZ6vPX4mx4o=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=Wmp37pBpLHW2whkCnRUoYbvgL3rO12HreMYAgZgVbe+ty2WlNc3iCbVbzk25U98eQ2xNFEFg4VtWyfAlN37pGz/XH9xKXsnCtPuBBNmn7w8x3ITVlMAavj9IVrt7V7/E0RC0s9S3WEm0shetrBaiI8saMXm/1s8tbgdZx1QPwCQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NNXBPlPd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NNXBPlPd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18D0A1F0089B; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 10:58:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791370700; bh=FmP+pubLQ6p2PYKYBHUnSMCXOIFoWoeub9J35/iNso8=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=NNXBPlPdMAlvNLmd9x3ER1h6ZaGEp1S8QtAz+o1vqdX391w5xEA3vb/B3fYVzWnqn gqtBVqQDl8itNIgv18X4eGGDfeIbHNKpBqKg+ZWRNw3TU503FtCPNpt+nV8Hn8LyTX U5nHS03R2368Ef4fOmZ/3vinLwulnfJbLetiqmzjwCcm5+6iwr1bgiL37riluKXqX+ Ffqxz6YTXE1fW2l0D1Bm5Yp2akkKlKgdtKKerKbrJT4+Kxn5oSLWs+E/M8Klj2So0C MTjjYUV0E6Qthc0fJazUGOBSeLMGIgiye9WMqMlstK+rWFmDIKcPbqH6kHajgIXC3R 5DiNGhClMMYcw== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/20] dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add K3 BCDMA V2 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi" Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261007102936.2402427-15-s-adivi@ti.com> References: <20261007102936.2402427-1-s-adivi@ti.com> <20261007102936.2402427-15-s-adivi@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 10:58:19 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Medium] dt-bindings: dma: ti: am62l-bcdma missing power-domains/clocks p= roperties -- commit 7cc1465076fec744d409700a2f52d2abf1725b87 Author: Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi dt-bindings: dma: ti: Add K3 BCDMA V2 This commit introduces a new binding document for the Texas Instruments K3 Block Copy DMA (BCDMA) V2. It is intended for AM62L and describes block copy and split channels. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/ti,am62l-dmss-bcdma= .yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/ti,am62l-dmss-bcdma.yaml > new file mode 100644 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/ti,am62l-dmss-bcdma.yaml [ ... ] > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/dma/dma-controller.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: ti,am62l-dmss-bcdma > + > + reg: > + items: [Severity: Medium] Since the AM62L transitions to standard ARM SCMI and drops the proprietary ti,sci properties, should the standard "power-domains" and "clocks" properties be explicitly declared in this properties block? The AM64 variant utilized an independent "ti,sci-dev-id =3D <26>", indicati= ng independent resource management in firmware distinct from the DMSS parent bus. If a device tree author adds "power-domains =3D <&scmi_pds X>;" to the ti,am62l-dmss-bcdma node to describe this hardware, it appears schema validation will falsely reject it because unevaluatedProperties is set to false further down in the schema. --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007102936.2402= 427-1-s-adivi@ti.com?part=3D14