From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C1A3AEF4C; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791460298; cv=none; b=CWyX4YdoOkN+ny/tdxk8/cn6lnfsFiwKb3S2aAlu14sSDvvGUd1dKjokfBECFueojQeJGuTNoObcL1lu/8M5tWo5705wnNxeUzbsOIMh6nd2MjX4cxFsvrjtn4vZVpUiHxp/T97u+Rl2WOMsxx+nS0wHniNR3hR2n8a9pomKTlU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791460298; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EWYHRSudcxqUJnQUoAh+0tjtwUWTSVHYs//jTXMBfpc=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=mGKrm/EIcCtEAvwHoZQ1VAvGK7sVjnUWutDgxHoGHHUVUGOszXz6bkY20XO/hb6MWHXe0QiJhCO4fwUUE6ARRHxaLHG0mwVoBjbuQOsg1Jq5RJLHqb9drF/CN006SIVtSCuKCx7ydce6ZstRpJOL8wldc0+8F/yAUNagrPyqNbI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cPtCwXPm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cPtCwXPm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE3C91F000FF; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 11:51:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791460297; bh=EWYHRSudcxqUJnQUoAh+0tjtwUWTSVHYs//jTXMBfpc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cPtCwXPm6Jgo7iwcKbAomEPslM75rzBxDwkNDR+LWD3pQimLd2XesawgmHaxemAgb rnPCv9xIvBULkAIcAwlw/Mixvu5NOYqal14jV2yMoaEQZhuHkR4hm0XSSZnUOoS+Ss JxSiomXwgrb+aqyP7Jc6mb4lYYvgzs4oaMFrEz0CnaDbsQYq/qPfyYhXCYzS+iFrlR /KhsFJwjil6vX7HH+DcQsguSwb65X6hX13I5g/MsSB/kksyycvP0+4ZVxgjgZLjfW4 YjdJvwYBGQ24YAAc5150oHMp4KZrzVH4BVnRbpRbgaELmuPtGCIXFedb6T/nY9RWjA HVpV2lttNS+og== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] peci: Add support for PECI CC 0x83 retry condition Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Changhuang Liang" Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261008100623.7085-4-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> References: <20261008100623.7085-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> <20261008100623.7085-4-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:51:36 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Some PECI client devices may return completion code 0x83, this > completion code means that a command response is in progress, which > is not currently handled by the driver. >=20 > Add PECI_CC_RESP_IN_PROGRESS definition and map it to -EAGAIN so that > the request will be retried appropriately, similar to other retryable > completion codes (0x80, 0x81, 0x82). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008100623.7085= -1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com?part=3D3