From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Coia Prant" <coiaprant@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 2/6] dt-bindings: net: pcs: add rockchip,rk3568-xpcs support
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:53:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-165902@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008175225.3375274-3-coiaprant@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] net: pcs: unconditional AN restart quirk may break standard DW SGMII PHYs
- [Medium] net: pcs: xpcs: interrupt storm in SGMII mode due to uncleared AN status
--
commit 9bbe537f2904ae4cf66c0b099833bc944c6e3043
Author: Coia Prant <coiaprant@gmail.com>
dt-bindings: net: pcs: add rockchip,rk3568-xpcs support
Add device tree binding documentation for the Synopsys DesignWare
XPCS integrated on the Rockchip RK3568 SoC.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> index b415b93d77c15..6466e0ff2a98b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -816,9 +825,14 @@ static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> + /* Clear CL37 AN complete status */
> + ret = xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_AN_INTR_STS, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (neg_mode == PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_INBAND_ENABLED)
> ret = xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, MII_BMCR,
> - mdio_ctrl | BMCR_ANENABLE);
> + mdio_ctrl | BMCR_ANENABLE | BMCR_ANRESTART);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this unconditional AN restart quirk break standard DW SGMII PHYs?
According to the DW databook, an AN restart is not needed for MAC-side SGMII.
While explicitly documented as a workaround for a timing quirk in
Rockchip RK3568, applying it unconditionally to all compliant SGMII deployments
(e.g., NXP SJA1105) could trigger link flapping or state machine violations by
continually interrupting a link that is transitioning to an 'up' state.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1093,9 +1107,18 @@ static int xpcs_get_state_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - /* Clear AN complete status or interrupt */
> - if (state->an_complete)
> - xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_AN_INTR_STS, 0);
> + if (state->an_complete) {
> + /* Clear AN complete status or interrupt */
> + ret = xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_AN_INTR_STS, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Can this cause an interrupt storm in SGMII mode due to uncleared AN status?
In xpcs_get_state_c37_sgmii(), when the link successfully comes up,
DW_VR_MII_C37_ANSGM_SP_LNKSTS is true and the function returns 0 early:
drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c:xpcs_get_state_c37_sgmii() {
...
if (ret & DW_VR_MII_C37_ANSGM_SP_LNKSTS) {
...
state->link = true;
...
return 0;
}
...
}
By returning early, the function bypasses this block that explicitly clears
DW_VR_MII_AN_INTR_STS. Since the register is not read-to-clear, the
ANCMPLT_INTR bit remains set.
If a driver operates with xpcs->pcs.poll = false (like Wangxun TXGBE) and the
interrupt is enabled, will the un-cleared status cause the MAC interrupt
handler to loop indefinitely?
> + /* Initiate the next round of AN */
> + ret = xpcs_modify(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, MII_BMCR, BMCR_ANRESTART,
> + BMCR_ANRESTART);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this unconditional AN restart quirk break standard DW SGMII PHYs?
Similar to xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(), this applies an explicit
Auto-Negotiation (AN) restart via BMCR_ANRESTART unconditionally when AN
completes.
Since this workaround is for Rockchip RK3568, executing it on any non-Rockchip
DW SGMII interface when AN finishes could interrupt a link that is
transitioning to an 'up' state.
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261008175225.3375274-1-coiaprant@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 17:51 [PATCH net-next v11 0/6] net: pcs: add basic support for RK3568 XPCS Coia Prant
2026-10-08 17:51 ` [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] net: pcs: xpcs: add ANRESTART support for SGMII link recovery Coia Prant
2026-10-08 17:51 ` [PATCH net-next v11 2/6] dt-bindings: net: pcs: add rockchip,rk3568-xpcs support Coia Prant
2026-10-09 16:49 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-09 17:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-08 17:51 ` [PATCH net-next v11 3/6] net: pcs: xpcs: add Rockchip RK3568 platform glue driver Coia Prant
2026-10-09 17:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 17:51 ` [PATCH net-next v11 4/6] dt-bindings: net: rockchip-dwmac: document pcs-handle Coia Prant
2026-10-09 16:50 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-10-08 17:51 ` [PATCH net-next v11 5/6] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: add SGMII support for RK3568 Coia Prant
2026-10-09 17:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 17:52 ` [PATCH net-next v11 6/6] MAINTAINERS: add entry for Rockchip XPCS driver Coia Prant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-165902@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=coiaprant@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox