From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v25 10/10] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 5-Port Gigabit DSA Switch driver
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 16:11:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-166723@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009161102.38961-11-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 7 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net: dsa: an8855: Port matrix is unconditionally zeroed out during port_enable
- [Medium] net: dsa: an8855: Unchecked regmap_read in an8855_phylink_mac_link_up causes silent register corruption
- [Medium] net: dsa: an8855: Uninitialized stack variable read in an8855_port_fdb_dump()
- [Medium] net: dsa: an8855: an8855_phylink_mac_enable_tx_lpi() leaves stale timer values on immediate LPI
- [Medium] net: dsa: an8855: missing mtu_enforcement_ingress flag allows MTU violation
- [Low] net: dsa: an8855: Driver duplicates standard UAPI statistics as private ethtool strings
- [Low] net: dsa: an8855: an8855_port_enable() leaves priv->ports[port].enable true on error
--
commit d3cae945049e5b42ed716ab1ac6797e64ffa036c
Author: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 5-Port Gigabit DSA Switch driver
This patch adds support for the Airoha AN8855 5-Port Gigabit DSA switch,
including phylink MAC operations and standard switch functions. It supports
multiple port speeds, though 5G speed is currently disabled pending PCS
configuration support.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mediatek/an8855.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mediatek/an8855.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mediatek/an8855.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1765 @@
[ ... ]
> +static const struct mt7530_mib_desc an8855_mib[] = {
> + MIB_DESC(MT7530_MIB_TX_DROP, -1, "TxDrop"),
> + MIB_DESC(MT7530_MIB_TX_CRC_ERR, -1, "TxCrcErr"),
> + MIB_DESC(MT7530_MIB_TX_COLLISION, -1, "TxCollision"),
> + MIB_DESC(AN8855_MIB_TX_OVERSIZE_DROP, -1, "TxOversizeDrop"),
[Severity: Low]
Is it necessary to expose these standard hardware counters through
driver-private ethtool strings? The driver already implements the standard
.get_eth_mac_stats interface. Exposing values like TxDrop and TxCrcErr
via ethtool -S duplicates standard UAPI statistics, which goes against the
Networking Drivers guidelines for standard statistics.
[ ... ]
> +static int an8855_port_fdb_dump(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + dsa_fdb_dump_cb_t *cb, void *data)
> +{
> + struct an8855_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> + int banks, count = 0;
> + u32 rsp;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> +
> + /* Load search port */
> + ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, AN8855_ATWD2,
> + FIELD_PREP(AN8855_ATWD2_PORT, BIT(port)));
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> + ret = mt7530_lib_fdb_cmd(&priv->lib_priv, MT7530_FDB_START,
> + AN8855_FDB_MAT_MAC_PORT, &rsp);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + do {
> + /* From response get the number of banks to read, exit if 0 */
> + banks = FIELD_GET(AN8855_ATC_HIT, rsp);
[Severity: Medium]
Could this read an uninitialized stack value? If mt7530_lib_fdb_cmd()
succeeds but the final regmap_field_read(..., rsp) inside it fails, the
function returns 0 without populating rsp. This would leave rsp
uninitialized here, leading to unpredictable loop behavior when parsing FDB
entries.
[ ... ]
> +static void an8855_phylink_mac_link_up(struct phylink_config *config,
> + struct phy_device *phydev, unsigned int mode,
> + phy_interface_t interface, int speed,
> + int duplex, bool tx_pause, bool rx_pause)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_phylink_to_port(config);
> + struct an8855_priv *priv = dp->ds->priv;
> + int port = dp->index;
> + u32 reg = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> +
> + regmap_read(priv->regmap, AN8855_PMCR_P(port), ®);
[Severity: Medium]
What happens if this regmap_read() fails? The return value is not checked,
so reg would remain 0. The function then sets specific bits (speed, duplex,
TX_EN, RX_EN) and writes it back, which could silently overwrite and
corrupt other configuration bits (like MAC mode or backoff settings) that
were configured in an8855_phylink_mac_config().
[ ... ]
> +static int an8855_port_enable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + struct phy_device *phy)
> +{
> + struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
> + struct an8855_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> +
> + /* Allow the user port gets connected to the cpu port and also
> + * restore the port matrix if the port is the member of a certain
> + * bridge.
> + */
> + if (dsa_port_is_user(dp)) {
> + struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dp->cpu_dp;
> +
> + priv->ports[port].pm |= BIT(cpu_dp->index);
> + }
> + priv->ports[port].enable = true;
> + ret = regmap_fields_write(priv->lib_priv.fields[MT7530_PCR_MATRIX],
> + port, 0);
[Severity: High]
Should this be passing priv->ports[port].pm instead of 0? Writing the
literal 0 disables the port's forwarding matrix in hardware, effectively
isolating the port and dropping all forwarded traffic, rather than
applying the port matrix computed just above.
[Severity: Low]
Also, if this regmap_fields_write() fails, the function jumps to the exit
label and returns an error without reverting priv->ports[port].enable back
to false. Can this desynchronize the software state from the hardware state
and cause issues in loops that check priv->ports[i].enable (such as the LPI
timer calculation)?
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + ret = regmap_set_bits(priv->regmap, AN8855_PMCR_P(port),
> + AN8855_PMCR_TX_EN | AN8855_PMCR_RX_EN);
> +
> +exit:
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static int an8855_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* Set min a max ageing value supported */
> + ds->ageing_time_min = AN8855_L2_AGING_MS_CONSTANT;
> + ds->ageing_time_max = FIELD_MAX(AN8855_AGE_CNT) *
> + FIELD_MAX(AN8855_AGE_UNIT) *
> + AN8855_L2_AGING_MS_CONSTANT;
> +
> + /* User reported problem with WiFi roaming and
> + * ethernet port. Enabling assisted learning fix
> + * the issue.
> + */
> + ds->assisted_learning_on_cpu_port = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Does this switch require the mtu_enforcement_ingress flag to be set here?
Because mt7530_lib_port_change_mtu() configures the MTU limit globally
based on the CPU port's requested MTU, user ports configured with smaller
MTUs might accept oversized frames. Setting ds->mtu_enforcement_ingress =
true would let the DSA core normalize bridged port MTUs.
[ ... ]
> +static int an8855_phylink_mac_enable_tx_lpi(struct phylink_config *config,
> + u32 timer, bool tx_clock_stop)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, AN8855_CKGCR,
> + AN8855_LPI_TXIDLE_THD_MASK, val);
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dp->ds->dev, "failed to set global LPI timer\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = regmap_set_bits(priv->regmap, AN8855_PMEEECR_P(port),
> + AN8855_LPI_MODE_EN);
[Severity: Medium]
If timer == 0 is requested to enter LPI immediately, the software array
priv->tx_lpi_timer_ports[port] is not updated to 0. If the port previously
had a non-zero timer, won't this leave a stale value in the array? Because
the global LPI timer is derived from the maximum of all enabled ports, a
stale non-zero value here could artificially inflate the global threshold.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dp->ds->dev, "failed to enable LPI for port %d\n",
> + port);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261009161102.38961-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-10 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 16:10 [PATCH net-next v25 00/10] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 support Christian Marangi
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 01/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Document support for Airoha AN8855 DSA Switch Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 02/10] dt-bindings: net: Document support for AN8855 Switch Internal PHY Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 03/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Document support for Airoha AN8855 Switch SoC Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 04/10] mfd: an8855: Add support for Airoha AN8855 Switch Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:02 ` Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 05/10] net: phy: Add Airoha AN8855 Internal Switch Gigabit PHY Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:03 ` Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 06/10] net: dsa: tag_mtk: add Airoha variant usage of this TAG Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:04 ` Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 07/10] MAINTAINERS: add myself as maintainer for Airoha AN8855 Switch Christian Marangi
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 08/10] net: dsa: move mediatek DSA driver in dedicated directory Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 09/10] net: dsa: mt7530: generalize and move common function to lib module Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 12:06 ` Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next v25 10/10] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 5-Port Gigabit DSA Switch driver Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 12:11 ` Christian Marangi
2026-10-10 16:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-166723@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox