From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hung-Chun Tseng" <alan.tseng.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: spacemit: mark K1 board boot devices bootph-pre-ram
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168780@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012235624.77993-3-alan.tseng.cs@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] dts: missing bootph-pre-ram on pinctrl and regulator dependencies for SPL
--
commit 76ae02e32445137eb75156ac64fdd5ee85cb4ef0
Author: Hung-Chun Tseng <alan.tseng.cs@gmail.com>
riscv: dts: spacemit: mark K1 board boot devices bootph-pre-ram
This patch adds the bootph-pre-ram property to I2C buses, board EEPROMs, PMICs,
and QSPI flashes on various SpacemiT K1 boards. These additions enable
U-Boot's SPL to access the devices during the early boot phase before
DRAM training.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-cm6.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-cm6.dtsi
> index 81c40df2a3663..6269d2ba78ed0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-cm6.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-cm6.dtsi
> @@ -93,6 +95,7 @@ serial-number {
> };
>
> &i2c8 {
> + bootph-pre-ram;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&i2c8_cfg>;
> status = "okay";
[Severity: Medium]
Will this I2C pinmux setup fail in the SPL?
The I2C bus is marked for SPL, but the pin configuration node i2c8_cfg in
k1-pinctrl.dtsi and the base pinctrl controller pinctrl@d401e000 in k1.dtsi
both lack the bootph-pre-ram property.
U-Boot's fdtgrep will strip these unmarked nodes from the SPL device tree,
which will prevent the I2C pins from being multiplexed correctly.
> @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ &i2c8 {
> pmic@41 {
> compatible = "spacemit,p1";
> reg = <0x41>;
> + bootph-pre-ram;
> interrupts = <64>;
> vin1-supply = <®_vcc_4v>;
> vin2-supply = <®_vcc_4v>;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this PMIC probe fail in the SPL phase?
The PMIC relies on the reg_vcc_4v fixed regulator as its input supply, but
the reg_vcc_4v node was not marked with bootph-pre-ram.
Without this property, the fixed regulator will be excluded from the SPL
device tree, leading to dangling phandles and early boot probe failures for
the PMIC.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dts
> index 635e95aad14a5..406b7ca163db8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dts
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-milkv-jupiter.dts
[ ... ]
> @@ -386,6 +393,7 @@ &qspi {
> flash@0 {
> compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> reg = <0>;
> + bootph-pre-ram;
> spi-max-frequency = <26500000>;
> spi-rx-bus-width = <4>;
> spi-tx-bus-width = <4>;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this flash fail to operate during early boot?
The flash@0 node uses buck4_3v3 as its vcc-supply. While buck1 and buck3 were
marked with bootph-pre-ram in this patch, buck4_3v3 was omitted.
The missing property on buck4_3v3 will cause the supply node to be stripped
from the SPL device tree, breaking flash access before RAM is initialized.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012235624.77993-1-alan.tseng.cs@gmail.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 23:56 [PATCH 0/2] riscv: dts: spacemit: mark K1 boot nodes bootph-pre-ram Hung-Chun Tseng
2026-10-12 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: dts: spacemit: k1: mark boot-critical SoC " Hung-Chun Tseng
2026-10-13 0:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv: dts: spacemit: mark K1 board boot devices bootph-pre-ram Hung-Chun Tseng
2026-10-13 0:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168780@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.tseng.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox