From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: mfd@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] bus: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:55:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171108@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-xg6846b-bcmbca-xrdp-reset-v1-4-daf5d177e113@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] bus: Missing sparse lock annotations for transport lock functions
--
commit f8e671cc4d072dbd3353e224bb3d5cee80468de7
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
bus: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport
This commit adds a bus driver for shared access to the Processor Monitor Bus
(PMB) of the third generation Platform Management Controller (PMC3), initially
for BCM6846. It serializes complete register sequences with a mutex and a
hardware lock.
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/bcm/bcmbca-pmb.h b/include/linux/soc/bcm/bcmbca-pmb.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..f95523d52e01b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/bcm/bcmbca-pmb.h
[ ... ]
> +/*
> + * Processor Monitor Bus (PMB) operations sleep. Hold the transport lock
> + * across a complete sequence, including read/modify/write operations.
> + * A successful lock must be paired with unlock, including on errors.
> + */
> +int bcmbca_pmb_lock(struct bcmbca_pmb *pmb);
> +void bcmbca_pmb_unlock(struct bcmbca_pmb *pmb);
[Severity: Low]
Does this code need sparse lock annotations for the transport lock functions?
Without __acquires(&pmb->lock) and __releases(&pmb->lock) on these
prototypes, sparse will report context imbalance warnings when child drivers
call bcmbca_pmb_lock() and bcmbca_pmb_unlock() (when built with C=1). While
sparse has limited strictness with mutexes compared to spinlocks, adding
the annotations can prevent build-time context imbalance warnings.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014-xg6846b-bcmbca-xrdp-reset-v1-0-daf5d177e113@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 9:48 [PATCH RFC 0/5] BCMBCA PMB reset controller Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 9:48 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] dt-bindings: mfd: Describe the BCM6846 PMC complex Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 9:48 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] dt-bindings: soc: Describe the BCM6846 Processor Monitor Bus Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 9:48 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] dt-bindings: reset: Describe the BCMBCA PMB reset controller Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 10:23 ` Philipp Zabel
2026-10-14 9:48 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] bus: Add a shared BCMBCA PMC3 PMB transport Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 9:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 9:48 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] reset: Add BCMBCA block resets through the PMB Linus Walleij
2026-10-14 11:13 ` Philipp Zabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171108@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox