From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdurrahman Hussain" <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 23:29:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172020@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-nh-of-alias-overlay-v8-4-0f74f05ac762@nexthop.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] of: UAF in of_find_node_opts_by_path() due to lockless read of of_aliases
--
commit b06b8f06ef78bdf618e4aa0aefa4a93a890ea63d
Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>
of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications
This commit introduces a reconfig notifier to dynamically update the /aliases
lookup table when device tree overlays add or remove aliases. It mirrors
property changes into aliases_lookup and manages entries added at runtime
versus boot time. An aliases_mutex is added to protect the lookup list.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1435675876-2159-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150630172131.D4E6CC4041A@trevor.secretlab.ca/ [2]
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 6a6d9f8439dd1..b70dedce06fe4 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1934,6 +1934,159 @@ static void of_alias_add(struct alias_prop *ap, struct device_node *np,
> ap->alias, ap->stem, ap->id, np);
> }
>
[ ... ]
> +static int of_aliases_reconfig_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct of_reconfig_data *rd = arg;
> +
> + /* of_aliases may still be NULL when an overlay creates the node */
> + if (!rd->dn || !of_node_is_aliases(rd->dn))
> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&aliases_mutex);
> + switch (action) {
> + case OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE:
> + if (!of_aliases)
> + of_aliases = of_node_get(rd->dn);
> + break;
> + case OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE:
> + if (of_aliases == rd->dn) {
> + of_aliases = NULL;
> + of_aliases_forget_all();
> + of_node_put(rd->dn);
> + }
> + break;
[Severity: High]
Does this lockless read of of_aliases in of_find_node_opts_by_path() introduce
a Use-After-Free race?
The commit message states: "on DETACH the changeset holds its own references
across the notifier so the put here cannot be the final one while readers
still walk the node."
While the changeset holds a reference during the notifier, a reader in
of_find_node_opts_by_path() in drivers/of/base.c reading of_aliases is
completely lockless and not in an RCU read-side critical section. If the
reader thread is preempted immediately after loading the of_aliases pointer
but before calling of_node_get():
CPU1 (Reader)
of_find_node_opts_by_path()
// Starts executing: aliases = of_node_get(of_aliases);
// Reads global of_aliases pointer
<preempted>
CPU2 (Changeset detach)
of_aliases_reconfig_notifier()
of_aliases = NULL;
of_node_put(rd->dn);
<changeset completes detachment, drops its final reference>
<node is freed>
CPU1 (Reader resumes)
// Calls of_node_get() with the stale pointer
of_node_get(stale_pointer); // Use-After-Free
Can the reader be preempted long enough for the changeset detach to fully
complete and free the node before the reader increments the refcount?
> + case OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY:
> + of_alias_create(rd->prop, alias_alloc, true);
> + break;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014-nh-of-alias-overlay-v8-0-0f74f05ac762@nexthop.ai?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 23:17 [PATCH v8 0/6] of: teach overlay code to keep /aliases in sync Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] of/overlay: look up absolute target-paths absolutely Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] of/overlay: return ERR_PTR from dup_and_fixup_symbol_prop() Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] of: hold a reference on of_aliases during alias path resolution Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] of: update /aliases lookup on reconfig notifications Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] of/overlay: rewrite /aliases path values to live-tree paths Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-10-14 23:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 23:17 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] of: unittest: cover /aliases updates from overlay apply/revert Abdurrahman Hussain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172020@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=abdurrahman@nexthop.ai \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox