From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sreeshankar K" <sreeshankar0910@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) driver for SM7250
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:34:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172310@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015051926.13752-3-sreeshankar0910@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] clk: qcom: rate configuration failure for gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src due to src mismatch
- [Low] kconfig: missing default ARCH_QCOM in SM_GCC_7250
--
commit d75ec50c6226017a3fb6c285ecf2e67ec2c78bb0
Author: Sreeshankar K <sreeshankar0910@gmail.com>
Subject: clk: qcom: Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) driver for SM7250
Add support for the global clock controller found on SM7250 based devices.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -1747,6 +1747,15 @@ config SM_GCC_7150
> Say Y if you want to use peripheral devices such as UART,
> SPI, I2C, USB, SD/UFS, PCIe etc.
>
> +config SM_GCC_7250
> + tristate "SM7250 Global Clock Controller"
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> + select QCOM_GDSC
[Severity: Low]
Is this Kconfig entry missing a default ARCH_QCOM clause? Peer configs
typically include it so the driver is built by default for Qualcomm targets.
Without it, this driver will be silently excluded from default builds.
> + help
> + Support for the global clock controller on SM7250 devices.
> + Say Y if you want to use peripheral devices such as UART,
> + SPI, I2C, USB, SD/UFS etc.
> +
> config SM_GCC_MILOS
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm7250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm7250.c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm7250.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2358 @@
[ ... ]
> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src[] = {
> + F(19200000, DT_BI_TCXO_AO, 1, 0, 0),
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_rcg2 gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src = {
> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x48010,
> + .mnd_width = 0,
> + .hid_width = 5,
> + .parent_map = gcc_parent_map_0,
> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(const struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src",
> + .parent_data = gcc_parent_data_0_ao,
> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_parent_data_0_ao),
[Severity: Medium]
Does ftbl_gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src use the wrong enum for its src field? It
currently uses the device tree index DT_BI_TCXO_AO (1) instead of the
hardware parent P_BI_TCXO (0).
Since the clock binds this frequency table with gcc_parent_map_0, which maps
the first entry to P_BI_TCXO (0), and bounds the iteration with a num_parents
of 1, a src of 1 will not match map[0].src (which is 0).
Could this cause the parent lookup to fail with -ENOENT and break rate
configuration for the CPUSS AHB clock?
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> + },
> +};
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015051926.13752-2-sreeshankar0910@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 5:19 Add initial support for Qualcomm SM7250 SoC Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add SM7250 global clock controller Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] clk: qcom: Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) driver for SM7250 Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] dt-bindings: firmware: qcom,scm: Document SM7250 SCM Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: qcom,pdc: Document SM7250 PDC Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: qcom-hw: Document SM7250 cpufreq hardware Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 5:19 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: Add SM7250 devicetree file Sreeshankar K
2026-10-15 5:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172310@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sreeshankar0910@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox