From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] of: reserved_mem: allocate and map the reserved_mem array early
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 08:51:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172520@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015082315.56876-3-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] of: memory corruption due to initializing unreserved memory regions
- [Medium] of: memory leak on dynamically-placed nomap region init failure
--
commit cc45d1ed473ae1f1390908145c8217f0d9614ac0
Author: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
of: reserved_mem: allocate and map the reserved_mem array early
Get rid of the static, limited-size reserved_mem array and replace it
with array allocated by memblock_alloc_raw() and accessed directly or
through a temporary early_memremap() mapping.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/asc6brs_g0ky0wOM@kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index 300fb236ab59f..0fd1683cba011 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -381,143 +384,109 @@ static void __init __rmem_check_for_overlap(void)
[ ... ]
> + /* Second pass: initialize the static regions */
> + fdt_for_each_subnode(child, fdt, node) {
> if (!of_fdt_device_is_available(fdt, child))
> continue;
>
> - uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
> -
> - err = __reserved_mem_reserve_reg(child, uname);
> - if (!err)
> - count++;
> + __reserved_mem_init_reg(child, fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL));
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally initialize memory regions even if they failed
reservation in the first pass?
If __reserved_mem_reserve_reg() fails for a region, it sets
reserved_mem_reserve_failed = true but does not exclude the node. When
__reserved_mem_init_reg() is called here, it will invoke
fdt_init_reserved_mem_node() for that node anyway.
Could this lead to blindly adding unreserved physical memory to the
reserved_mem array, allowing drivers to silently overwrite standard memory
that the page allocator considers free?
Additionally, if the node initialization subsequently fails (e.g. due to a
missing compatible match), could it execute memblock_phys_free() or
memblock_clear_nomap() on memory it never successfully owned?
drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c:fdt_init_reserved_mem_node() {
...
err = __reserved_mem_init_node(rmem, node);
if (err != 0 && err != -ENODEV) {
pr_info("node %s compatible matching fail\n", rmem->name);
rmem->name = NULL;
if (nomap)
memblock_clear_nomap(rmem->base, rmem->size);
else
memblock_phys_free(rmem->base, rmem->size);
return;
...
}
>
> - /*
> - * Save the nodes for the dynamically-placed regions
> - * into an array which will be used for allocation right
> - * after all the statically-placed regions are reserved
> - * or marked as no-map. This is done to avoid dynamically
> - * allocating from one of the statically-placed regions.
> - */
> - if (err != -ENOENT || !of_get_flat_dt_prop(child, "size", NULL))
> - continue;
> + /*
> + * Allocate the dynamically-placed regions only after all the
> + * statically-placed ones are reserved, to avoid overlapping with them.
> + */
> + fdt_for_each_subnode(child, fdt, node) {
> + int len;
>
> - if (dynamic_nodes_cnt == MAX_RESERVED_REGIONS) {
> - pr_err("too many defined dynamic regions, skip '%s'\n",
> - uname);
> + if (!of_fdt_device_is_available(fdt, child) ||
> + (of_flat_dt_get_addr_size_prop(child, "reg", &len) && len))
> continue;
> - }
>
> - dynamic_nodes[dynamic_nodes_cnt] = child;
> - dynamic_nodes_cnt++;
> - }
> - for (int i = 0; i < dynamic_nodes_cnt; i++) {
> - const char *uname;
> - int err;
> -
> - child = dynamic_nodes[i];
> - uname = fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL);
> - err = __reserved_mem_alloc_size(child, uname);
> - if (!err)
> - count++;
> + __reserved_mem_alloc_size(child,
> + fdt_get_name(fdt, child, NULL));
> }
[Severity: Medium]
If a dynamically-placed 'no-map' reserved memory region fails initialization
here, does it permanently leak memory from memblock.reserved?
When __reserved_mem_alloc_size() allocates memory via
memblock_phys_alloc_range(), the memory is added to memblock.reserved. It
then calls fdt_init_reserved_mem_node(), which has the following error
handling path:
drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c:fdt_init_reserved_mem_node() {
...
err = __reserved_mem_init_node(rmem, node);
if (err != 0 && err != -ENODEV) {
pr_info("node %s compatible matching fail\n", rmem->name);
rmem->name = NULL;
if (nomap)
memblock_clear_nomap(rmem->base, rmem->size);
else
memblock_phys_free(rmem->base, rmem->size);
return;
...
}
For 'no-map' regions, this clears the nomap flag but appears to omit
memblock_phys_free(rmem->base, rmem->size), which would leave the dynamically
allocated region permanently trapped in memblock.reserved.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015082315.56876-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20261015082333eucas1p28bad74cde14ee0afac2eea11bbe6696c@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-10-15 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] of: reserved_mem: use dynamically allocated reserved_mem array Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-15 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] of: reserved_mem: group allocation helpers together Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-15 8:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] of: reserved_mem: allocate and map the reserved_mem array early Marek Szyprowski
2026-10-15 8:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172520@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox