From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marcelo Schmitt" <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Support SPI 4-wire mode
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 02:19:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-175201@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fabe47973d8de0bc2f5177a99ef032a26b42d926.1792200021.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] iio: adc: ad4134: race with trigger handler in ad4134_buffer_setup_ops
- [Medium] iio: adc: ad4134: missing DOUT0 format config and cs_off in 4-wire mode
- [Medium] iio: adc: ad4134: spi_setup() ordering and mode desync in claim helpers
--
commit 8eb548670148a37e8ad1ee608a1ea7bc67bedb0c
Author: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@analog.com>
iio: adc: ad4134: Support SPI 4-wire mode
This commit extends the AD4134 ADC driver to support SPI 4-wire mode in
addition to minimum I/O mode by switching SPI clock phase and controlling
an external SDO/DOUT0 multiplexer between register and sample accesses.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4134.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4134.c
> index eaf5bb55f25ba..6b05e40f7aeb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad4134.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad4134.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -219,6 +237,85 @@ static const struct regmap_access_table ad4134_regmap_wr_table = {
> .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(ad4134_regmap_wr_range),
> };
>
> +/*
> + * When operating in modes other than minimum I/O mode, AD4134 register data on
> + * the SDO line is sampled on SCLK rising edge (SPI mode 0). In addition to
> + * that, when AD4134 SDO and DOUT0 pins are multiplexed by hardware OUTSIDE
> + * AD4134 SILICON, the multiplexer state must be set to route SDO to the SPI
> + * controller. With both SPI mode and multiplexer state properly set, register
> + * access runs as usual. Successful calls to this function must be balanced with
> + * calls to ad4134_release_reg_access() so to release the mux state lock. See
> + * AD4134 IIO documentation for details.
> + */
> +static int ad4134_claim_reg_access(struct ad4134_state *st)
> +{
> + unsigned int cur_mode = st->spi->mode & SPI_MODE_X_MASK;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (st->spi_mode != AD4134_SPI_MODE_NO_CS && cur_mode != SPI_MODE_0) {
> + st->spi->mode &= ~SPI_MODE_X_MASK;
> + st->spi->mode |= SPI_MODE_0;
> + ret = spi_setup(st->spi);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (st->spi_mode != AD4134_SPI_MODE_NO_CS && st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT])
> + return mux_state_select(st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT]);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
In ad4134_claim_reg_access() and ad4134_claim_sample_access(), can
mutating st->spi->mode and calling spi_setup() before mux_state_select()
leave the SPI mode out of sync or reconfigure the controller during an
active capture?
If spi_setup(st->spi) fails, st->spi->mode is not restored to cur_mode. On
the next call to the same claim helper, cur_mode already matches the
target mode, so spi_setup() is skipped while the SPI controller remains
configured in the previous mode.
Similarly, because spi_setup() runs before mux_state_select() acquires the
mux lock, if mux_state_select() fails (for example with -EINTR while
waiting in down_killable()), st->spi->mode and the SPI controller remain in
the new mode on an error return. In addition, if a register read occurs via
regmap debugfs while buffered capture holds the mux lock in SPI_MODE_1,
ad4134_claim_reg_access() will call spi_setup() to switch the controller to
SPI_MODE_0 before blocking on mux_state_select().
Should mux_state_select() be called before changing st->spi->mode and
calling spi_setup(), with st->spi->mode restored and the mux deselected if
spi_setup() fails?
[ ... ]
> @@ -261,7 +367,11 @@ static int ad4134_data_read(struct ad4134_state *st, unsigned int reg,
> {
> unsigned int i;
> u32 sample = 0;
> - int ret;
> + int access_ret, ret;
> +
> + ret = ad4134_claim_sample_access(st);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> /*
> * To be able to read data from all 4 channels through a single line, we
> @@ -277,7 +387,7 @@ static int ad4134_data_read(struct ad4134_state *st, unsigned int reg,
> ret = spi_write_then_read(st->spi, NULL, 0, st->rx_buf,
> BITS_TO_BYTES(AD4134_CHAN_PRECISION_BITS));
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto out_data_read_release;
[ ... ]
> @@ -372,6 +496,21 @@ static irqreturn_t ad4134_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static int ad4134_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + return ad4134_claim_sample_access(iio_priv(indio_dev));
> +}
> +
> +static int ad4134_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + return ad4134_release_sample_access(iio_priv(indio_dev));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops ad4134_buffer_setup_ops = {
> + .postenable = &ad4134_buffer_postenable,
> + .predisable = &ad4134_buffer_predisable,
> +};
[Severity: Medium]
Can using .postenable and .predisable in ad4134_buffer_setup_ops race with
ad4134_trigger_handler() in 4-wire mode?
In drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c, iio_enable_buffers() attaches the
trigger pollfunc before running .postenable:
if (iio_dev_opaque->currentmode == INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED) {
ret = iio_trigger_attach_poll_func(indio_dev->trig,
indio_dev->pollfunc);
if (ret)
goto err_disable_buffers;
}
if (indio_dev->setup_ops->postenable) {
ret = indio_dev->setup_ops->postenable(indio_dev);
Because iio_trigger_attach_poll_func() requests the threaded IRQ and enables
the external trigger, ad4134_trigger_handler() can start running
spi_sync_transfer() before or concurrently with ad4134_buffer_postenable()
calling ad4134_claim_sample_access() to update st->spi->mode, call
spi_setup(), and select st->mux_st[AD4134_DOUT0_INPUT].
Symmetrically, iio_disable_buffers() runs .predisable before detaching the
trigger pollfunc:
if (indio_dev->setup_ops->predisable) {
ret2 = indio_dev->setup_ops->predisable(indio_dev);
if (ret2 && !ret)
ret = ret2;
}
if (iio_dev_opaque->currentmode == INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED) {
iio_trigger_detach_poll_func(indio_dev->trig,
indio_dev->pollfunc);
}
This allows ad4134_buffer_predisable() to deselect the DOUT0 mux state
before iio_trigger_detach_poll_func() disables the trigger and frees the
pollfunc IRQ.
(Note also that in this commit, indio_dev->setup_ops is overwritten with
NULL by the subsequent devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(..., NULL) call in
ad4134_probe() until a later commit in the series passes
&ad4134_buffer_setup_ops to devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup().)
Should ad4134_buffer_setup_ops use .preenable and .postdisable instead of
.postenable and .predisable?
[ ... ]
> @@ -591,10 +725,61 @@ static int ad4134_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->regmap),
> "failed to initialize regmap");
>
> - ret = ad4134_min_io_mode_setup(st);
> - if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> - "failed to setup minimum I/O mode\n");
> + if (device_property_present(dev, "adi,spi-mode")) {
> + ret = device_property_match_property_string(dev, "adi,spi-mode",
> + ad4134_spi_modes,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(ad4134_spi_modes));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "getting adi,spi-mode property failed\n");
> +
> + st->spi_mode = ret;
> + } else {
> + /* Default to no-cs mode if adi,spi-mode is not specified */
> + st->spi_mode = AD4134_SPI_MODE_NO_CS;
> + }
> +
> + if (st->spi_mode == AD4134_SPI_MODE_NO_CS) {
> + /*
> + * The support hardware for AD4134 may have a multiplexer for
> + * selecting between AD4134 SDO and AD4134 DOUT0. If that mux
> + * is set but the user still wants to run AD4134 in minimum I/O
> + * mode, then DOUT0 is not used and the multiplexer OUTSIDE OF
> + * AD4134 SILICON must be set to select AD4134 SDO. See AD4134
> + * IIO documentation for details.
> + */
> + st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT] =
> + devm_mux_state_get_optional_selected(dev, "reg_access");
> + if (IS_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT]))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT]),
> + "failed to get reg_access mux-state\n");
> +
> + ret = ad4134_min_io_mode_setup(st);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "failed to setup minimum I/O mode\n");
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * This controls a multiplexer OUTSIDE OF AD4134 SILICON.
> + * See AD4134 IIO documentation for details.
> + */
> + st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT] = devm_mux_state_get(dev, "reg_access");
> + if (IS_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT]))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_SDO_INPUT]),
> + "failed to get reg_access mux-state\n");
> +
> + st->mux_st[AD4134_DOUT0_INPUT] = devm_mux_state_get(dev, "data_read");
> + if (IS_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_DOUT0_INPUT]))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->mux_st[AD4134_DOUT0_INPUT]),
> + "failed to get data_read mux-state\n");
> +
> + indio_dev->setup_ops = &ad4134_buffer_setup_ops;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
When st->spi_mode is AD4134_SPI_MODE_4_WIRE (and without SPI offload in the
later high-speed data capture commit), how does sample readout work in
ad4134_data_read() and ad4134_trigger_handler()?
Both ad4134_data_read() and ad4134_trigger_handler() read all 4 channels
sequentially over DOUT0, which requires AD4134_DIG_IF_CFG_REG to be set to
AD4134_DATA_FORMAT_SINGLE_CH_MODE. However, that register update is only
performed inside ad4134_min_io_mode_setup() when st->spi_mode is
AD4134_SPI_MODE_NO_CS (and in ad4134_offload_setup() for 1-lane offload in
the later commit), leaving AD4134_DIG_IF_CFG_REG unconfigured in non-offload
4-wire mode.
In addition, while ad4134_trigger_handler() sets .cs_off = true on its
spi_transfer, ad4134_data_read() uses spi_write_then_read(), which asserts
CS during each 3-byte read while transmitting 0x00 on SDI. In 4-wire mode,
CS is wired to the register SPI interface and st->crc_en is false, so won't
asserting CS while clocking SCLK perform an unintended write to
AD4134_IFACE_CONFIG_A_REG (0x00)?
Should AD4134_DIG_IF_CFG_REG also be configured for single-channel DOUT0
output in 4-wire mode, and should ad4134_data_read() use a spi_transfer
with .cs_off = true?
> +
> + st->odr_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "odr", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(st->odr_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->odr_gpio),
> + "failed to get ODR GPIO\n");
>
> ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(dev, indio_dev,
> iio_pollfunc_store_time,
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1792200021.git.marcelo.schmitt@analog.com?part=12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 1:56 [PATCH v5 00/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Enable greater sample rate data capture Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:56 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Adjust register map range Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:56 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Sign extend sample data Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Apply reset recovery wait time Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 2:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 5:55 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-10-17 19:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-17 1:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Update include list to comply with IWYU principles Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Serialize single-read operations Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 18:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Protect conventional device access from debug accesses Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 18:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Run shorter transfers when CRC is disabled Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Add support for digital filter type selection Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 2:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 1:59 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Support buffered data read Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 5:59 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-10-17 1:59 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4134: Document SPI connection mode Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:59 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4134: Document external multiplexer usage Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 1:59 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Support SPI 4-wire mode Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 2:19 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-17 19:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,ad4134: Document PWM usage Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Support high-speed data capture Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 2:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-17 19:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-17 2:00 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] Docs: iio: Add AD4134 Marcelo Schmitt
2026-10-17 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] iio: adc: ad4134: Enable greater sample rate data capture Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-175201@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.schmitt@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox