From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bob Hui" <bg9oxa@163.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ALIENTEK QuarkPi-CA2
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:33:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-180381@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021-quarkpi-ca2-v9-2-b75006b22bc5@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] arm64: dts: rockchip: missing rknn_mmu_0/1/2 enablement breaks NPU open()
- [High] arm64: dts: rockchip: missing domain-supply on pd_gpu and pd_npu
--
commit e4632e8324e154e7c3c642a2039af079523bc6b6
Author: Bob Hui <bg9oxa@163.com>
arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ALIENTEK QuarkPi-CA2
This commit adds the device tree for the ALIENTEK QuarkPi-CA2, an RK3588S
based board, enabling its onboard storage, regulators, display outputs,
networking, USB, audio, GPU, and NPU peripherals.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-quarkpi-ca2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-quarkpi-ca2.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..68ee2c0ad9d80
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-quarkpi-ca2.dts
[ ... ]
> +&gpu {
> + mali-supply = <&vdd_gpu_s0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
[Severity: High]
Should &pd_gpu and &pd_npu also specify domain-supply = <&vdd_gpu_s0> and
domain-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>?
In drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c, rk3588_pm_domains marks both
RK3588_PD_GPU (&pd_gpu) and RK3588_PD_NPU (&pd_npu) with
need_regulator = true, and rockchip_pm_add_one_domain() powers those domains
off during PMU probe. When a consumer attaches or resumes via
genpd_power_on() -> rockchip_pd_power_on() -> rockchip_pd_regulator_enable(),
the PMU driver looks up domain-supply on the power-domain node:
drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c:rockchip_pd_regulator_enable() {
if (!pd->info->need_regulator)
return 0;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pd->supply)) {
pd->supply = devm_of_regulator_get(pmu->dev, pd->node, "domain");
if (IS_ERR(pd->supply))
return PTR_ERR(pd->supply);
}
return regulator_enable(pd->supply);
}
In arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-quarkpi-ca2.dts, vdd_gpu_s0 is only
regulator-boot-on (without regulator-always-on) and both vdd_gpu_s0 and
vdd_npu_s0 configure regulator-off-in-suspend. Without domain-supply on
&pd_gpu and &pd_npu, the regulator core falls back to a dummy regulator with
a warning and rockchip_pd_power() attempts the PMU power-on handshake before
vdd_gpu_s0 or vdd_npu_s0 has been enabled (such as when panthor probes as a
module after unused boot-on regulators are disabled, or across system suspend
and resume).
> +
> +&rknn_core_0 {
> + npu-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>;
> + sram-supply = <&vdd_npu_mem_s0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&rknn_core_1 {
> + npu-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>;
> + sram-supply = <&vdd_npu_mem_s0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&rknn_core_2 {
> + npu-supply = <&vdd_npu_s0>;
> + sram-supply = <&vdd_npu_mem_s0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
[Severity: High]
Will opening the NPU accel device fail with -ENODEV unless &rknn_mmu_0,
&rknn_mmu_1, and &rknn_mmu_2 are also enabled?
In arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-base.dtsi, rknn_core_0, rknn_core_1,
and rknn_core_2 reference iommus = <&rknn_mmu_0>, <&rknn_mmu_1>, and
<&rknn_mmu_2>, which default to status = "disabled":
rknn_mmu_0: iommu@fdab9000 {
...
power-domains = <&power RK3588_PD_NPUTOP>;
status = "disabled";
};
Because arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-quarkpi-ca2.dts enables the
three rknn_core_* nodes without setting status = "okay" on &rknn_mmu_0,
&rknn_mmu_1, and &rknn_mmu_2, of_iommu_xlate() in drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
returns -ENODEV:
if (!of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np))
return -ENODEV;
This leaves the NPU core devices without an attached IOMMU. When userspace
opens the NPU device, rocket_open() in drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
calls rocket_iommu_domain_create() -> iommu_paging_domain_alloc() ->
__iommu_paging_domain_alloc_flags():
drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c:rocket_open() {
...
rocket_priv->domain = rocket_iommu_domain_create(rdev->cores[0].dev);
if (IS_ERR(rocket_priv->domain)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(rocket_priv->domain);
goto err_free;
}
...
}
which checks !dev_has_iommu(dev) and fails unconditionally with -ENODEV.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021-quarkpi-ca2-v9-0-b75006b22bc5@163.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 14:05 [PATCH v9 0/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add ALIENTEK QuarkPi-CA2 Bob Hui
2026-10-21 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: " Bob Hui
2026-10-22 2:58 ` Rob Herring
2026-10-21 14:05 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] arm64: dts: " Bob Hui
2026-10-21 14:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-180381@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bg9oxa@163.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox