From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wandun Chen" <chenwandun1@gmail.com>,
robh@kernel.org, baoquan.he@linux.dev, rppt@kernel.org,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
chenhuacai@kernel.org, kernel@xen0n.name, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr,
tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
saravanak@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pratyush@kernel.org,
ruirui.yang@linux.dev, robin.murphy@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:33:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-181179@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021083011.2170525-4-chenwandun1@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] crash_core: cmem->ranges overflow via unlocked iomem_resource hotplug
--
commit 24cd8bf08b74ae3e07f992972d3cd97b77d9fcf6
Author: Wandun Chen <chenwandun@lixiang.com>
crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug
This commit serializes crash_prepare_headers() with device_hotplug_lock
to prevent concurrent memory hotplug from changing the number of memory
ranges between counting and populating cmem->ranges. It also introduces
__crash_prepare_headers() for hotplug paths that already hold the lock.
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/message/20260806101002.1F84E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
> index faa0f22dbb41d..8a861a946e261 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -344,8 +345,8 @@ int crash_exclude_core_ranges(struct crash_mem **cmem)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int crash_prepare_headers(int need_kernel_map, void **addr, unsigned long *sz,
> - unsigned long *nr_mem_ranges)
> +int __crash_prepare_headers(int need_kernel_map, void **addr, unsigned long *sz,
> + unsigned long *nr_mem_ranges)
> {
> unsigned int max_nr_ranges;
> struct crash_mem *cmem;
> @@ -382,6 +383,18 @@ int crash_prepare_headers(int need_kernel_map, void **addr, unsigned long *sz,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +int crash_prepare_headers(int need_kernel_map, void **addr, unsigned long *sz,
> + unsigned long *nr_mem_ranges)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + lock_device_hotplug();
> + ret = __crash_prepare_headers(need_kernel_map, addr, sz, nr_mem_ranges);
> + unlock_device_hotplug();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Can cmem->ranges[] still overflow during __crash_prepare_headers() even when
device_hotplug_lock is held?
In __crash_prepare_headers(), arch_get_system_nr_ranges() counts the current
system ram ranges (plus a fixed number of split slots for exclusions),
allocates cmem via alloc_cmem(max_nr_ranges), and then populates
cmem->ranges[] in arch_crash_populate_cmem().
Neither the x86 callback in arch/x86/kernel/crash.c:
static int prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
{
struct crash_mem *cmem = arg;
cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = res->start;
cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = res->end;
cmem->nr_ranges++;
return 0;
}
nor the weak implementation in kernel/crash_core.c:
int __weak arch_crash_populate_cmem(struct crash_mem *cmem)
{
phys_addr_t start, end;
u64 i;
for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].start = start;
cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges].end = end - 1;
cmem->nr_ranges++;
}
return 0;
}
checks whether cmem->nr_ranges has reached cmem->max_nr_ranges before writing
to cmem->ranges[cmem->nr_ranges++].
However, Xen balloon memory hotplug inserts new system ram resources into
iomem_resource before acquiring device_hotplug_lock via the call chain:
balloon_thread() / xen_alloc_ballooned_pages()
-> add_ballooned_pages()
-> reserve_additional_memory()
-> additional_memory_resource()
Specifically, in drivers/xen/balloon.c:
static struct resource *additional_memory_resource(phys_addr_t size)
{
...
res->name = "System RAM";
res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
ret = allocate_resource(&iomem_resource, res,
size, 0, -1,
PAGES_PER_SECTION * PAGE_SIZE, NULL, NULL);
...
}
static enum bp_state reserve_additional_memory(void)
{
...
resource = additional_memory_resource(balloon_hotplug * PAGE_SIZE);
if (!resource)
goto err;
...
mutex_unlock(&balloon_mutex);
/* add_memory_resource() requires the device_hotplug lock */
lock_device_hotplug();
rc = add_memory_resource(nid, resource, MHP_MERGE_RESOURCE);
unlock_device_hotplug();
mutex_lock(&balloon_mutex);
...
balloon_stats.total_pages += balloon_hotplug;
...
}
Because reserve_additional_memory() inserts the resource into iomem_resource
and drops balloon_mutex before waiting on lock_device_hotplug(), and only
updates balloon_stats.total_pages after add_memory_resource() completes,
concurrent callers (such as balloon_thread() and xen_alloc_ballooned_pages())
can insert new system ram entries into iomem_resource while
crash_prepare_headers() or arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event() holds
device_hotplug_lock.
If those entries are inserted between arch_get_system_nr_ranges() and
arch_crash_populate_cmem(), wouldn't the extra ranges consume the reserved
split slots (causing crash_exclude_mem_range() to fail) or overflow
cmem->ranges[]? Should arch_crash_populate_cmem() and
prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback() also bounds-check cmem->nr_ranges
against cmem->max_nr_ranges?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261021083011.2170525-1-chenwandun1@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 8:30 [PATCH v9 0/8] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 1/8] riscv: build crash_mem ranges from memblock instead of resource tree Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 9:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 2/8] crash_core: fold duplicated memblock arch hooks into the weak default Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 3/8] crash_core: serialize crash header preparation against hotplug Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 9:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-21 9:48 ` Wandun
2026-10-22 2:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-10-22 7:44 ` Wandun
2026-10-22 8:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 4/8] crash_core: replace for_each_mem_range() with for_each_mem_region() Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 5/8] memblock: introduce MEMBLOCK_NODUMP flag Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 6/8] of: reserved_mem: add dumpable flag to opt-in vmcore Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 7/8] of: reserved_mem: mark /reserved-memory entries with MEMBLOCK_NODUMP Wandun Chen
2026-10-22 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 8:30 ` [PATCH v9 8/8] crash_core: skip MEMBLOCK_NODUMP regions when building vmcore ELF header Wandun Chen
2026-10-21 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 0/8] kdump: reduce vmcore size and capture time Rob Herring
2026-10-22 7:04 ` Wandun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-181179@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=baoquan.he@linux.dev \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chenwandun1@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ruirui.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox