From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lakshay Piplani" <lakshay.piplani@nxp.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] rtc: pcf85363: add watchdog support with configurable step size
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:09:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-185064@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026094712.205214-5-lakshay.piplani@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] rtc: pcf85363: spurious WDF handling in pcf85363_rtc_handle_irq()
--
commit 16cc51c19e1316f4895386e586c6d2ab87d77232
Author: Lakshay Piplani <lakshay.piplani@nxp.com>
rtc: pcf85363: add watchdog support with configurable step size
This commit adds alarm-only watchdog support to the PCF85263/PCF85363 RTC
driver using the watchdog subsystem, with dynamic 1 Hz and 0.25 Hz step
selection, interrupt handling via INTA, and suspend/resume support.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
> index 71b82f92a0031..e5ebfad1a2cea 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -540,6 +572,21 @@ static irqreturn_t pcf85363_rtc_handle_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
> }
>
> + if (flags & FLAGS_WDF) {
> + dev_warn_ratelimited(&pcf85363->rtc->dev,
> + "watchdog timer expired\n");
> +
> + err = pcf85363_clear_flags(pcf85363, FLAGS_WDF);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(&pcf85363->rtc->dev,
> + "failed to clear watchdog flag: %d\n",
> + err);
> + ack_failed = true;
> + } else {
> + handled = true;
> + }
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can pcf85363_rtc_handle_irq() in drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c log false
"watchdog timer expired" warnings and return spurious IRQ_HANDLED on a
shared interrupt line when FLAGS_WDF is latched in CTRL_FLAGS while
INT_WDIE is masked in CTRL_INTA_EN?
On PCF85263/PCF85363, CTRL_FLAGS latches FLAGS_WDF whenever the CTRL_WDOG
counter reaches 0, regardless of whether INT_WDIE is set in CTRL_INTA_EN
(which only controls routing of WDF to the INTA pin).
In pcf85363_suspend(), INT_WDIE is masked while the CTRL_WDOG counter is
left running in repeat mode:
/* Disconnect WDF from the wakeup-capable INTA line; keep counting. */
ret = regmap_update_bits(pcf85363->regmap, CTRL_INTA_EN, INT_WDIE, 0);
if (ret)
return ret;
wd->suspended = true;
During any system sleep longer than the watchdog timeout, the counter
expires and latches FLAGS_WDF. On wakeup, resume_device_irqs() in
dpm_resume_noirq() re-enables device interrupts before dpm_resume() runs
pcf85363_resume(). If an RTC alarm (FLAGS_A1F), timestamp (FLAGS_TSR1F,
FLAGS_TSR2F, FLAGS_TSR3F), battery switch-over (FLAGS_BSF), or another
device on a shared IRQ line fires before pcf85363_resume() runs,
pcf85363_rtc_handle_irq() executes while wd->suspended is still true and
INT_WDIE is still masked, reporting a false watchdog expiry and setting
handled = true.
A similar state can also occur in two other paths:
1. In pcf85363_probe(), INT_WDIE is masked and only FLAGS_A2F | FLAGS_PIF
are cleared before devm_request_threaded_irq() is called. When
CONFIG_WATCHDOG=n, pcf85363_watchdog_init() returns early without clearing
a stale FLAGS_WDF or halting a bootloader- or battery-backed CTRL_WDOG
counter.
2. In pcf85363_wdt_stop(), CTRL_WDOG is halted and INT_WDIE is masked
without clearing any FLAGS_WDF that latched concurrently (or that latches
later if writing CTRL_WDOG fails while masking INT_WDIE succeeds).
Should pcf85363_rtc_handle_irq() ignore (or silently clear without setting
handled = true or logging a warning) FLAGS_WDF when the watchdog interrupt
is not armed, and should pcf85363_probe() and pcf85363_wdt_stop() also
ensure FLAGS_WDF is cleared when masking INT_WDIE?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026094712.205214-1-lakshay.piplani@nxp.com?part=5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 9:47 [PATCH v8 1/5] dt-bindings: rtc: nxp,pcf85363: add timestamp mode config Lakshay Piplani
2026-10-26 9:47 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] rtc: pcf85363: support reporting battery switch-over via RTC_VL Lakshay Piplani
2026-10-26 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:47 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] rtc: pcf85363: add timestamp support with configurable timestamp mode Lakshay Piplani
2026-10-26 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 9:47 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] rtc: pcf85363: add oscillator offset calibration support Lakshay Piplani
2026-10-26 9:47 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] rtc: pcf85363: add watchdog support with configurable step size Lakshay Piplani
2026-10-26 11:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-185064@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lakshay.piplani@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox