From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793016105; b=GGzAoP+Dig+SHOgBWQOdC5FZPsKhwa3o0f9cbi2HrtkyWaLw/ZQqyx5VBz6UHus1UzAx ls8WUfx/hFJwkoyHpzQ/VYcvjVOB+r8I8pwsnNEh4KLyLI7HgVo+1A4BggPThsRYOsLDK I6tNwuX9qzItnpsct3FaX576DGJFfB6decfUU6IzMBjGLvp/35DjTZ0AlVQO9JA392HiL m57wiA1V0Myu5/kDe5JZcQsZ7Tri5ZcSEogUUCcUd8FZXfa4tvZoycMHPKkHEwpZJ00QA vcs/vAPxHCMe6TJnoQE6vZJx2y4Xh+rj1IPU+WDr6F9sBdUpzKSvZ2YGicLlV2V5C7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793016105; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date; bh=YlzxsM+I5sjQdg8MF4q4GmHlBacz+7Wy/Xw5ZiK05NU=; b=pZ5gx4/z0mOQz8sDiEUUcE5IH5u6AhGYi93+tJuZIOAT2/nDwDpEv/FWXZCIVWc2fQr5 6I7i6NbLQWwPfSkIEhcb4LlMKWUN99j5gSG/4uyEwJH7V7CzAWEkiTR8lLCQP0U+Kik/c zxSUS93nCxVtZgPL0x6iJ+sxvYdUFt6kzypTFtMOfGjfsrPqkLht3dF6bCXQLFdto4qf6 tzeNXZTp8tKAjmqXPp0H3iM19eWf1/JkKtaYgHV6IXt2s3XWVL4BxkxuOgjGxoH4FFtpg 4iKQmHDtDBsLGuv10OqU3REhFNy1l1QYZcpFjfPEaj26stwMfcQT843IQkltor91iew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b="h8Cdizn/"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7A3D606A332; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=h8Cdizn/ Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22E411F01825; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:01:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793016104; bh=YlzxsM+I5sjQdg8MF4q4GmHlBacz+7Wy/Xw5ZiK05NU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=h8Cdizn/0898e5pomPrkGCD1tDhufp7mFIvKa7zQaYM5xWS078DtKfd8+CpIBP8Sc sATPqyqGLL21Kp8z1PLDpcvgUJ4FePeryXN6/dbdJ6nuRXVvAZIidj++SnhFemNbs2 p/2ZltpGBrk2cgySmXB4x7wXN+6WiL+tREKfaRpucnmAkitrVni4nnGkMm4EBNLbEw zl+qP8DE0xavCg8QavZjcxtt42yyr3MbyWEVNvTtaVMAPqQbQxQh5URp+BaHk/uA8/ cSAKuPmsSXU/Qd/Jom3QpbZp5wFrnIwxbYBG7pgNyvuYQzw/w/sp0MtoZStt4PuF5V 9TnQhhA53jgmg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/15] drm/imx: dc-ed: Support getting source selection Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Liu Ying" Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261026-imx8-dc-prefetch-v7-10-a0b50cc4fc65@nxp.com> References: <20261026-imx8-dc-prefetch-v7-0-a0b50cc4fc65@nxp.com> <20261026-imx8-dc-prefetch-v7-10-a0b50cc4fc65@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:01:43 +0000 X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [Medium] drm/imx: dc-ed: invalid link IDs accepted in dc_ed_pec_src_sel_g= et() -- commit e94375137aef3b831a8ffe20e951e2c25abaed0f Author: Liu Ying drm/imx: dc-ed: Support getting source selection This commit adds dc_ed_pec_src_sel_get() to read and validate the ExtDst source selection from PIXENGCFG_DYNAMIC. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-ed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-e= d.c > index de1b71315eabd..67163dca1363c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-ed.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-ed.c > @@ -149,6 +149,35 @@ void dc_ed_pec_src_sel(struct dc_ed *ed, enum dc_lin= k_id src) > } > } > =20 > +int dc_ed_pec_src_sel_get(struct dc_ed *ed, enum dc_link_id *src) > +{ > + u32 val; > + int ret; > + > + ret =3D regmap_read(ed->reg_pec, PIXENGCFG_DYNAMIC, &val); > + if (ret) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + switch (val) { > + case LINK_ID_NONE: > + case LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME0: > + case LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME4: > + case LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME1: > + case LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME5: > + case LINK_ID_FETCHWARP2: > + case LINK_ID_FETCHLAYER0: > + case LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND0: > + case LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND1: > + case LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND2: > + case LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND3: > + *src =3D val; > + dev_dbg(ed->dev, "get source selection: 0x%02x\n", val); > + return 0; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > +} [Severity: Medium] Should dc_ed_pec_src_sel_get() validate the value read from PIXENGCFG_DYNAM= IC against src_sels[] rather than accepting LINK_ID_FETCHWARP2 and LINK_ID_FETCHLAYER0? In drivers/gpu/drm/imx/dc/dc-ed.c, src_sels[] defines the valid source link IDs for the ExtDst unit and is used by dc_ed_pec_src_sel(): static const enum dc_link_id src_sels[] =3D { LINK_ID_NONE, LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME0, LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME1, LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME4, LINK_ID_CONSTFRAME5, LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND3, LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND2, LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND1, LINK_ID_LAYERBLEND0, }; void dc_ed_pec_src_sel(struct dc_ed *ed, enum dc_link_id src) { int i; for (i =3D 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(src_sels); i++) { if (src_sels[i] =3D=3D src) { regmap_write(ed->reg_pec, PIXENGCFG_DYNAMIC, src); return; } } } Because fetch units only connect to LayerBlend secondary inputs (sec_sels[]= in dc-lb.c), LINK_ID_FETCHWARP2 and LINK_ID_FETCHLAYER0 are rejected by dc_ed_pec_src_sel(). However, dc_ed_pec_src_sel_get() accepts them and retu= rns 0 instead of -EINVAL, which could cause callers such as dc_crtc_disable_at_boot() to treat an invalid ExtDst source as an active pipeline. Would it be better to iterate over src_sels[] in dc_ed_pec_src_sel_get() ju= st like dc_ed_pec_src_sel() does? --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026-imx8-dc-pr= efetch-v7-0-a0b50cc4fc65@nxp.com?part=3D10