From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Myria Sarvay" <myrialsarvay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Use macros for per-implementation init functions
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 10:31:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-195055@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-m3-plus-pmu-events-v1-5-a8eb6c1139fe@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] drivers/perf: apple_m1: unused macro m2_pmu_init_pmceid aliases removed symbol
- [Low] perf: apple_m1: redundant macro aliasing and duplication in APPLE_PMU_INIT()
--
commit b798f559facbfb19db0eef028f7f7e42ebc0042c
Author: Myria Sarvay <myrialsarvay@gmail.com>
drivers/perf: apple_m1: Use macros for per-implementation init functions
This commit replaces the per-core-family PMU initialization functions in
drivers/perf/apple_m1_cpu_pmu.c with an APPLE_PMU_INIT() macro and adds
compatibility macro aliases for M2 callbacks and attribute groups.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/apple_m1_cpu_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/apple_m1_cpu_pmu.c
> index a14864263bf1f..e7e9b51ffadcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/apple_m1_cpu_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/apple_m1_cpu_pmu.c
> @@ -653,71 +653,40 @@ static int apple_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> }
>
> /* Device driver gunk */
> -static int m1_pmu_ice_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> -{
> - cpu_pmu->name = "apple_icestorm_pmu";
> - cpu_pmu->enable = m1_pmu_enable_event;
> - cpu_pmu->get_event_idx = m1_pmu_get_event_idx;
> - cpu_pmu->map_event = m1_pmu_map_event;
> - cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = m1_pmu_set_event_filter;
> -
> - cpu_pmu->map_pmuv3_event = m1_pmu_map_pmuv3_event;
> -
> - cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS] = &m1_pmu_events_attr_group;
> - cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_FORMATS] = &m1_pmu_format_attr_group;
> - return apple_pmu_init(cpu_pmu);
> -}
[ ... ]
> +#define APPLE_PMU_INIT(gen, family) \
> +static int gen ## _pmu_ ## family ## _init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) \
> +{ \
> + cpu_pmu->name = "apple_" #family "_pmu"; \
> + cpu_pmu->enable = gen ## _pmu_enable_event; \
> + cpu_pmu->get_event_idx = gen ## _pmu_get_event_idx; \
> + cpu_pmu->map_event = gen ## _pmu_map_event; \
> + cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = gen ## _pmu_set_event_filter; \
> + \
> + cpu_pmu->map_pmuv3_event = gen ## _pmu_map_pmuv3_event; \
> + \
> + cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_EVENTS] = &gen ## _pmu_events_attr_group; \
> + cpu_pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_FORMATS] = &gen ## _pmu_format_attr_group; \
> + return apple_pmu_init(cpu_pmu); \
> +}
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but APPLE_PMU_INIT(gen, family) expands all seven callback
and attr_groups assignments into every per-family init function (such as
m1_pmu_icestorm_init() and m1_pmu_firestorm_init()), even though core
families within the same generation only differ in cpu_pmu->name.
Because APPLE_PMU_INIT() unconditionally token-pastes gen ## _pmu_* for
every field, any generation that shares callbacks or attribute groups with
an earlier generation also requires a block of #define aliases to satisfy
token pasting (including in subsequent patches for m4 and a18).
Would it be cleaner to follow the pattern in drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
(PMUV3_INIT_SIMPLE calling armv8_pmu_init), or have per-generation init
helpers called by a small per-family wrapper that only sets cpu_pmu->name,
to avoid both the #define alias blocks and the repeated per-family
assignments?
> +
> +#define m2_pmu_enable_event m1_pmu_enable_event
> +#define m2_pmu_get_event_idx m1_pmu_get_event_idx
> +#define m2_pmu_set_event_filter m1_pmu_set_event_filter
> +#define m2_pmu_map_pmuv3_event m1_pmu_map_pmuv3_event
> +#define m2_pmu_init_pmceid m1_pmu_init_pmceid
[Severity: Low]
Is m2_pmu_init_pmceid needed here?
Earlier in the series ("drivers/perf: apple_m1: Support per-implementation
event tables"), m1_pmu_init_pmceid() was replaced by apple_pmu_init_pmceid(),
which is called directly from apple_pmu_init():
static int apple_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
...
apple_pmu_init_pmceid(cpu_pmu);
bitmap_set(cpu_pmu->cntr_mask, 0, M1_PMU_NR_COUNTERS);
return 0;
}
APPLE_PMU_INIT() does not reference gen ## _pmu_init_pmceid, so
m2_pmu_init_pmceid (and a18_pmu_init_pmceid in "drivers/perf: apple_m1: Add
Apple A18 Support") is unused and aliases a non-existent symbol. Can this
macro definition be dropped?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261103-m3-plus-pmu-events-v1-0-a8eb6c1139fe@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 10:14 [PATCH 00/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Add M3/M4/A18 Pro Support Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 01/13] dt-bindings: arm: pmu: Add Apple M3/M4/A18 Pro SoC CPU PMU compatibles Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 02/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Remove unused variables Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 03/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Support per-implementation event tables Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 04/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Support per-implementation event size Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 05/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Use macros for per-implementation init functions Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 06/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Add Apple M3 Series Support Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 07/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Add Apple M4 " Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 08/13] drivers/perf: apple_m1: Add Apple A18 Support Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 09/13] arm64: dts: apple: t603x: Add PMU Device Nodes Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 10/13] arm64: dts: apple: t8122: " Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 11/13] arm64: dts: apple: t604x: " Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 11:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 12/13] arm64: dts: apple: t8132: " Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 10:14 ` [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: apple: t8140: " Myria Sarvay via B4 Relay
2026-11-03 11:23 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-195055@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myrialsarvay@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox