From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: add a driver for the Atheros/Qualcomm ath79 PLL controller
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 01:59:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206010@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110013646.1582970-6-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] clk: ath79: fw_devlink blocks ath79_clk_probe() when ref
lacks clock-frequency
- [Medium] clk: ath79: missing UPDATING wait in
ath79_pcie_pll_unprepare()
--
commit dd79c08de0fc1914f23e0beb52d8e93809a55692
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
clk: add a driver for the Atheros/Qualcomm ath79 PLL controller
This commit adds a common clock driver for the Atheros/Qualcomm ath79 PLL
controller, registering the reference and CPU clocks early via
CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() and the remaining clocks from a platform driver.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-ath79.c b/drivers/clk/clk-ath79.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..3ddbd020afb12
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-ath79.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,778 @@
[ ... ]
> +static int ath79_pcie_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct ath79_pcie_pll *pll = to_ath79_pcie_pll(hw);
> + u32 t;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Every write freezes the high speed clocks for about 60 us, so
> + * leave a PLL that the bootloader already started alone.
> + */
> + if (ath79_pcie_pll_is_prepared(hw))
> + return 0;
> +
> + t = readl(pll->reg) & ~pll->pwd;
> + writel(t, pll->reg);
> + ret = ath79_pcie_pll_wait(pll);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + writel(t & ~pll->bypass, pll->reg);
> + return ath79_pcie_pll_wait(pll);
> +}
> +
> +static void ath79_pcie_pll_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct ath79_pcie_pll *pll = to_ath79_pcie_pll(hw);
> + u32 t;
> +
> + t = readl(pll->reg) | pll->bypass;
> + writel(t, pll->reg);
> + writel(t | pll->pwd, pll->reg);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Should ath79_pcie_pll_unprepare() call ath79_pcie_pll_wait(pll) after each
write to pll->reg, like ath79_pcie_pll_prepare() does? Without waiting
for pll->updating to clear, the second write is issued while the ~60 us
update from setting pll->bypass is still in progress, and the function
returns before the PLL finishes powering down.
[ ... ]
> +static void __init ath79_clk_early_init(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> + const struct ath79_clk_soc_data *soc;
> + unsigned long rates[ATH79_OUT_NUM];
> + struct ath79_clk_regs regs = {};
> + struct clk_hw *ref, *cpu;
> + struct clk *ref_clk;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + soc = of_match_node(ath79_clk_of_match, np)->data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The board's crystal. Old device trees leave its rate out, and the
> + * arch code then registers it from the bootstrap pins as "ref".
> + */
> + ref_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ref");
> + if (IS_ERR(ref_clk))
> + ref_clk = clk_get_sys(NULL, "ref");
[ ... ]
> +static int ath79_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[Severity: Medium]
Does fw_devlink permanently block ath79_clk_probe() with -EPROBE_DEFER on
device trees where the "ref" fixed-clock node omits clock-frequency?
When the "ref" node has no clock-frequency property, _of_fixed_clk_setup()
fails with -EIO before of_clk_add_hw_provider() can mark its fwnode
initialized, while of_clk_init() still sets OF_POPULATED on the node so no
platform device is created for it. Because the PLL node has clocks =
<&ref>, fw_devlink creates a fwnode_link to the uninitialized "ref" node,
and device_links_check_suppliers() rejects probing ath79_clk_driver with
-EPROBE_DEFER, leaving the DDR, AHB, MDIO, UART1 and PCIe clocks
permanently at ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110013646.1582970-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 1:36 [PATCH v2 0/6] clk: add a driver for the ath79 PLL controller Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] MIPS: ath79: apply the QCA956x timer workaround in setup Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] MIPS: ath79: move the bootstrap reference clock to setup Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 1:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] dt-bindings: clock: ath79: add the UART1 clock Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 13:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-10 23:37 ` Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] dt-bindings: clock: ath79: add the PCIe PLL clock Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] clk: add a driver for the Atheros/Qualcomm ath79 PLL controller Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 1:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 1:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] MIPS: ath79: remove the old clock code Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] clk: add a driver for the ath79 PLL controller Brian Masney
2026-11-10 2:35 ` Rosen Penev
2026-11-10 2:54 ` Brian Masney
2026-11-10 20:47 ` Rosen Penev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206010@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox