From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arun Iyengar" <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
media-ci@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] media: verisilicon: Don't hold a VPU behind an IOMMU in reset after remove
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 07:50:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206534@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-hantro-robust-v1-2-6b6269c05bfa@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [High] media: verisilicon: null pointer dereference in hantro_probe()
[1]
--
commit 4e4d9ad2d3b9dfeb29c03b860ceeca44937863cf
Author: Arun Iyengar <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
media: verisilicon: Don't hold a VPU behind an IOMMU in reset after remove
This commit leaves the resets of a VPU behind an IOMMU deasserted during
probe error cleanup and driver removal so the IOMMU can access its
registers when it subsequently runtime suspends.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> index 26e5d5547466e..702d878c7b509 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,22 @@ static struct v4l2_m2m_dev *hantro_get_v4l2_m2m_dev(struct hantro_dev *vpu)
> return v4l2_m2m_init(&vpu_m2m_ops);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The resets may also cover the bus interface that the IOMMU of the VPU is
> + * accessed through, e.g. on the RK3588 AV1 decoder. The IOMMU is a separate
> + * device which is runtime resumed with the VPU while it is unbound, and
> + * accesses its registers again when it runtime suspends afterwards. Holding
> + * the VPU in reset at that point causes an asynchronous external abort, so
> + * leave the resets deasserted for a VPU behind an IOMMU.
> + */
> +static void hantro_reset_assert(struct hantro_dev *vpu)
> +{
> + if (device_iommu_mapped(vpu->dev))
> + return;
> +
> + reset_control_assert(vpu->resets);
> +}
> +
> static int hantro_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct of_device_id *match;
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can hantro_probe() hit a
NULL pointer dereference [1] when dereferencing match->data?
drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro_drv.c:hantro_probe() {
...
match = of_match_node(of_hantro_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
vpu->variant = match->data;
...
}
If a probe is forced via sysfs bind on a device without a matching OF node,
of_match_node() returns NULL and match->data is dereferenced
unconditionally.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-4e7cd977-2daf-4048-ad53-7801b4bba80e
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110-hantro-robust-v1-0-6b6269c05bfa@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 7:17 [PATCH 0/5] media: verisilicon: Recover the Rockchip VPUs from faults and timeouts Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 7:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: media: rockchip,rk3568-vepu: Add the reset lines Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 7:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] media: verisilicon: Don't hold a VPU behind an IOMMU in reset after remove Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 7:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 7:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] media: verisilicon: Reset the Rockchip encoder cores on timeout Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 8:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 7:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] media: verisilicon: Reinitialize the IOMMU after a timeout Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 8:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 7:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add the reset lines of the RK3588 VEPU121 cores Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206534@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=aiyengar1990@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=media-ci@linuxtv.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox