Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jacky Chou" <jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/7] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:39:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212429@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-support_ast2700-v6-2-238020bf46cf@aspeedtech.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: requiring phy-mode on AST2700
  breaks use-ncsi
- [Low] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: split schema instead of adding more
  if-thens
--

commit d4c79ebecc8b3f53e3b3064e58bdd5d5f51b3ece
Author: Jacky Chou <jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com>

dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible

This commit adds the standalone aspeed,ast2700-mac compatible to the
Faraday FTGMAC100 Device Tree binding schema along with its clock, reset,
and phy-mode rules.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml
> index 9d352e3686aaf..613d4f1caa4fa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml

[ ... ]

> @@ -79,12 +80,21 @@ allOf:
>            contains:
>              enum:
>                - aspeed,ast2600-mac
> +              - aspeed,ast2700-mac
>      then:
>        properties:
>          resets: true
>      else:
>        properties:
>          resets: false
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            const: aspeed,ast2700-mac
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - phy-mode

[Severity: Medium]
Does unconditionally requiring phy-mode on aspeed,ast2700-mac break
dtbs_check validation for nodes configured with use-ncsi?

The binding allows use-ncsi without an MDIO PHY or phy-mode (as shown in
the schema's first example), and ftgmac100_probe_dt() handles use-ncsi
via ftgmac100_probe_ncsi() with PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII directly without
reading phy-mode.

Also, the commit message explains this rule as matching the driver's
probe-time requirement, whereas bindings should describe hardware
constraints, and the check added in commit "net: ftgmac100: Require
phy-mode for AST2700" is in ftgmac100_mii_probe(), which is only reached
for legacy MDIO bus scanning on AST2400/AST2500/Faraday.

>    - if:
>        properties:
>          compatible:
> @@ -105,6 +115,7 @@ allOf:
>              enum:
>                - aspeed,ast2500-mac
>                - aspeed,ast2600-mac
> +              - aspeed,ast2700-mac
>      then:
>        properties:
>          clocks:
> @@ -124,6 +135,7 @@ allOf:
>                  - aspeed,ast2400-mac
>                  - aspeed,ast2500-mac
>                  - aspeed,ast2600-mac
> +                - aspeed,ast2700-mac
>      then:
>        properties:
>          clocks: false

[Severity: Low]
Now that commit "dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Make Aspeed compatibles
standalone" decoupled the Aspeed variants from faraday,ftgmac100, allOf
uses five per-compatible if-then blocks to partition resets, phy-mode,
clocks, and clock-names across the variants.  Should the Aspeed bindings
be split into a separate schema document instead of adding more
per-compatible conditionals here?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-support_ast2700-v6-0-238020bf46cf@aspeedtech.com?part=2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12  8:39 [PATCH net-next v6 0/7] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 support Jacky Chou
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Make Aspeed compatibles standalone Jacky Chou
2026-11-12 18:43   ` Conor Dooley
2026-11-13  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/7] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible Jacky Chou
2026-11-12 18:44   ` Conor Dooley
2026-11-13  8:39   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/7] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible support Jacky Chou
2026-11-13  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/7] net: ftgmac100: Enable AST2700 RMII support Jacky Chou
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/7] net: ftgmac100: Require phy-mode for AST2700 Jacky Chou
2026-11-13  8:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 6/7] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 upper DMA address support Jacky Chou
2026-11-12  8:39 ` [PATCH net-next v6 7/7] net: ftgmac100: Allow building on ARM64 Jacky Chou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212429@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox