From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rupesh Majhi" <zoone.rupert@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: pressure: dps310: add a data-ready trigger
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 08:59:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214316@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114083828.18059-3-zoone.rupert@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] iio: pressure: dps310: blocking temp wait in
dps310_fill_channels() on IRQ
--
commit fcac9adbf4cd29f69b8e01eb7d00e6810af90fad
Author: Rupesh Majhi <zoone.rupert@gmail.com>
iio: pressure: dps310: add a data-ready trigger
This commit adds an IIO data-ready trigger driven by the DPS310 interrupt
to capture pressure or temperature results with interrupt timestamps.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> index 5cee23986f307..4bff9e93ea92c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1375,6 +1393,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dps310_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> s32 channels[2];
> aligned_s64 timestamp;
> } scan = { };
> + s64 timestamp;
> int rc;
>
> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> @@ -1383,7 +1402,12 @@ static irqreturn_t dps310_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> if (rc)
> goto err;
>
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(iio, &scan, sizeof(scan), iio_get_time_ns(iio));
> + if (iio_trigger_using_own(iio))
> + timestamp = data->irq_timestamp;
> + else
> + timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(iio);
> +
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_ts(iio, &scan, sizeof(scan), timestamp);
>
> err:
> iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
> @@ -1391,6 +1415,105 @@ static irqreturn_t dps310_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static irqreturn_t dps310_irq_handler(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> + struct dps310_data *data = private;
> +
> + data->irq_timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(data->iio);
> +
> + return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t dps310_irq_thread(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> + struct dps310_data *data = private;
> + unsigned int status;
> +
> + if (regmap_read(data->regmap, DPS310_INT_STS, &status))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + if (!(status & (DPS310_INT_STS_TMP | DPS310_INT_STS_PRS)))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + iio_trigger_poll_nested(data->trig);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int dps310_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool state)
> +{
> + struct dps310_data *data = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
> + struct regmap *map = data->regmap;
> + unsigned int status, bits = 0;
> + int rc;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> +
> + if (state) {
> + /* Status latched while disabled would fire a stale interrupt */
> + rc = regmap_read(map, DPS310_INT_STS, &status);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + /* Without pressure, scans follow the temperature results */
> + if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, data->iio->active_scan_mask))
> + bits = DPS310_INT_PRS;
> + else
> + bits = DPS310_INT_TMP;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does triggering on DPS310_INT_PRS block in dps310_fill_channels() waiting
for DPS310_TMP_RDY whenever the pressure rate exceeds the temperature rate?
drivers/iio/pressure/dps310.c:dps310_fill_channels() {
/* Compensation needs a temperature, so it is sampled either way */
rc = dps310_read_temp_raw_locked(data);
if (rc)
return rc;
...
if (test_bit(DPS310_SCAN_PRESSURE, scan_mask)) {
rc = dps310_read_pres_raw_locked(data);
}
Each scan reads DPS310_TMP_BASE and clears DPS310_TMP_RDY. When the next
DPS310_INT_PRS interrupt fires before a new temperature conversion has
completed (for example at any pressure rate above the 1 Hz default
temperature rate), dps310_read_temp_raw_locked() sleeps until the next
temperature conversion finishes.
While the IRQ thread sleeps with DPS310_INT_STS already cleared and the
oneshot IRQ masked, new pressure conversions overwrite DPS310_PRS_B0..B2
and re-latch DPS310_INT_STS_PRS. The scan then pairs the overwritten
pressure sample with the earlier data->irq_timestamp, throttles capture to
the temperature rate, and leaves DPS310_INT_STS_PRS latched on return,
which causes a spurious level interrupt or stalls edge-triggered
interrupts.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114083828.18059-1-zoone.rupert@gmail.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 8:38 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: pressure: dps310: data-ready trigger Rupesh Majhi
2026-11-14 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: pressure: infineon,dps310: Add interrupts Rupesh Majhi
2026-11-14 8:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: pressure: dps310: add a data-ready trigger Rupesh Majhi
2026-11-14 8:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214316@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zoone.rupert@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox