From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mike Jagdis <jaggy@purplet.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: diald slow to be useful...
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:46:29 +0100
Sender: linux-diald-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <3CF61115.90700@purplet.demon.co.uk>
References: <001d01c207b5$355dcd10$e239832c@jrws2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-diald-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: <linux-diald.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Robert Jenkins <raj@jrw.co.uk>
Cc: linux-diald@vger.kernel.org

Robert Jenkins wrote:

> I'm using iptables for both NAT & firewall on the machine with diald,
> and I've got both ip_dynaddr and routingf enabled.


I believe the current iptables recommendation is to use
a "-o $PUB_IF" on the masquerade rule to only masquerade
packets going out on the Internet facing interface. Do you
know if that's true? Is it true for PPP interfaces too?

				Mike