From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BCEB2EAFE; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OSo1JyPI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F3F8C433C8; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:03:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702479785; bh=ERYPWlZcuAsc3JTXR2wiRcqYpvAqlyOmPFSh5X5mKMU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From; b=OSo1JyPIEEiOqSQkxHZc0rW9gEY26xIxY2pFyOxbAqRhG/rDBaAxtpEvgzIC3a3pt BOTZ1qII5VJxtazr9MqP8EACT+Y10dkh0nTg/2zbkGhXa39zOHCp0lS2agt9gVpSUA CltxBEF/1zLz9K6yQKhdzCOxewWh1wdpeSegUeTuIg7GJzS/3k3qz+1WtZ7QogvGzF xVziHZ9wNt/ymRn/TJmviMnMb+ThIlYT9UCT3XrJ4PtKzjYsjv5K19rJ/CRjLpihym bUxdTZmbWd91qtxA4hOgs52zd4GHLQMWjdLK6nitFMxSRK908BKfPZqXp/RqsI97M0 /RT3giJthg+FQ== Message-ID: <09db7e8dadfa5d73bdcbf2f6c6af9fbd@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:03:02 +0000 From: "Maxime Ripard" To: davidgow@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kunit: Add APIs for managing devices In-Reply-To: <20231208-kunit_bus-v2-1-e95905d9b325@google.com> References: <20231208-kunit_bus-v2-1-e95905d9b325@google.com> Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, "Brendan Higgins" , "David Gow" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "Jaroslav Kysela" , "Jonathan Corbet" , "Kees Cook" , "Liam Girdwood" , "Mark Brown" , "Matti Vaittinen" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Rae Moar" , "Shuah Khan" , "Stephen Boyd" , "Takashi Iwai" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 18:09:29 +0800, davidgow@google.com wrote: > Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other > functions. While it's possible to create these with > root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this > is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after, > for example, a failed assertion. > > [ ... ] Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime