From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: "zhenglifeng (A)" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
robert.moore@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, ray.huang@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
ionela.voinescu@arm.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, treding@nvidia.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com, ksitaraman@nvidia.com,
sanjayc@nvidia.com, nhartman@nvidia.com, bbasu@nvidia.com,
sumitg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 20:08:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a2b7d49-bd1f-442e-9247-705cd2eb0d1c@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14851f8e-b6ac-42ff-9623-b7ac8d8893e2@huawei.com>
On 25/12/25 17:36, zhenglifeng (A) wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 2025/12/23 20:13, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>> Add sysfs interface to read/write the Performance Limited register.
>>
>> The Performance Limited register indicates to the OS that an
>> unpredictable event (like thermal throttling) has limited processor
>> performance. It contains two sticky bits set by the platform:
>> - Bit 0 (Desired_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is
>> constrained below desired performance. Not used when Autonomous
>> Selection is enabled.
>> - Bit 1 (Minimum_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is
>> constrained below minimum performance.
>>
>> These bits remain set until OSPM explicitly clears them. The write
>> operation accepts a bitmask of bits to clear:
>> - Write 1 to clear bit 0
>> - Write 2 to clear bit 1
>> - Write 3 to clear both bits
> It's a bit odd that users write a 1 to and then read a 0 from the sysfs
> file. I think it is better to seperate these two bits, as two sysfs files.
> Then users can write '0' or 'clear' or others into them to clear each bit.
I think its better to keep one sysfs interface per HW register.
Can change the perf_limited write interface to accept bit index
instead of bitmask.
- Write 0 to clear bit 0 (desired performance excursion)
- Write 1 to clear bit 1 (minimum performance excursion)
Thank you,
Sumit Gupta
>
>> This enables users to detect if platform throttling impacted a workload.
>> Users clear the register before execution, run the workload, then check
>> afterward - if set, hardware throttling occurred during that time window.
>>
>> The interface is exposed as:
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/perf_limited
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 15 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> index 9f28c20d902d..ffd866c1c00d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> @@ -1786,6 +1786,62 @@ int cppc_set_max_perf(int cpu, u32 max_perf)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_max_perf);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_get_perf_limited - Get the Performance Limited register value.
>> + * @cpu: CPU from which to get Performance Limited register.
>> + * @perf_limited: Pointer to store the Performance Limited value.
>> + *
>> + * The returned value contains sticky status bits indicating platform-imposed
>> + * performance limitations.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, -EIO on failure, -EOPNOTSUPP if not supported.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_get_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 *perf_limited)
>> +{
>> + return cppc_get_reg_val(cpu, PERF_LIMITED, perf_limited);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_perf_limited);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * cppc_set_perf_limited() - Clear bits in the Performance Limited register.
>> + * @cpu: CPU on which to write register.
>> + * @bits_to_clear: Bitmask of bits to clear in the perf_limited register.
>> + *
>> + * The Performance Limited register contains two sticky bits set by platform:
>> + * - Bit 0 (Desired_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is constrained
>> + * below desired performance. Not used when Autonomous Selection is enabled.
>> + * - Bit 1 (Minimum_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is constrained
>> + * below minimum performance.
>> + *
>> + * These bits are sticky and remain set until OSPM explicitly clears them.
>> + * This function only allows clearing bits (the platform sets them).
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, -EINVAL for invalid bits, -EIO on register
>> + * access failure, -EOPNOTSUPP if not supported.
>> + */
>> +int cppc_set_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 bits_to_clear)
>> +{
>> + u64 current_val, new_val;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Only bits 0 and 1 are valid */
>> + if (bits_to_clear & ~CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_MASK)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (!bits_to_clear)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + ret = cppc_get_perf_limited(cpu, ¤t_val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Clear the specified bits */
>> + new_val = current_val & ~bits_to_clear;
>> +
>> + return cppc_set_reg_val(cpu, PERF_LIMITED, new_val);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_perf_limited);
>> +
>> /**
>> * cppc_set_enable - Set to enable CPPC on the processor by writing the
>> * Continuous Performance Control package EnableRegister field.
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>> index 1e282dfabc76..1f8825006940 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
>> @@ -1052,12 +1052,42 @@ static ssize_t store_max_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * show_perf_limited - Show Performance Limited register status
>> + * @policy: cpufreq policy
>> + * @buf: buffer to write the value to
>> + *
>> + * Read the Performance Limited register to check if platform throttling
>> + * (thermal/power/current limits) occurred.
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t show_perf_limited(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + return cppc_cpufreq_sysfs_show_u64(policy->cpu,
>> + cppc_get_perf_limited, buf);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * store_perf_limited - Clear Performance Limited register bits
>> + * @policy: cpufreq policy
>> + * @buf: buffer containing the bitmask of bits to clear
>> + * @count: number of bytes in buf
>> + *
>> + * Write 1 to clear bit 0, 2 to clear bit 1, or 3 to clear both.
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t store_perf_limited(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + return cppc_cpufreq_sysfs_store_u64(policy->cpu,
>> + cppc_set_perf_limited, buf, count);
>> +}
>> +
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(freqdomain_cpus);
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(auto_select);
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(auto_act_window);
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(energy_performance_preference_val);
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(min_perf);
>> cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(max_perf);
>> +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(perf_limited);
>>
>> static struct freq_attr *cppc_cpufreq_attr[] = {
>> &freqdomain_cpus,
>> @@ -1066,6 +1096,7 @@ static struct freq_attr *cppc_cpufreq_attr[] = {
>> &energy_performance_preference_val,
>> &min_perf,
>> &max_perf,
>> + &perf_limited,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> index a49b50bddaf9..57e04326a4b6 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
>> #define CPPC_EPP_PERFORMANCE_PREF 0x00
>> #define CPPC_EPP_ENERGY_EFFICIENCY_PREF 0xFF
>>
>> +#define CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_DESIRED_EXCURSION BIT(0)
>> +#define CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_MINIMUM_EXCURSION BIT(1)
>> +#define CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_MASK (CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_DESIRED_EXCURSION | \
>> + CPPC_PERF_LIMITED_MINIMUM_EXCURSION)
>> +
>> /* Each register has the folowing format. */
>> struct cpc_reg {
>> u8 descriptor;
>> @@ -177,6 +182,8 @@ extern int cppc_get_min_perf(int cpu, u64 *min_perf);
>> extern int cppc_set_min_perf(int cpu, u32 min_perf);
>> extern int cppc_get_max_perf(int cpu, u64 *max_perf);
>> extern int cppc_set_max_perf(int cpu, u32 max_perf);
>> +extern int cppc_get_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 *perf_limited);
>> +extern int cppc_set_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 perf_limited);
>> extern int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf);
>> extern int amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator(unsigned int cpu, u64 *numerator);
>> extern int amd_detect_prefcore(bool *detected);
>> @@ -285,6 +292,14 @@ static inline int cppc_set_max_perf(int cpu, u32 max_perf)
>> {
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>> +static inline int cppc_get_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 *perf_limited)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> +static inline int cppc_set_perf_limited(int cpu, u64 perf_limited)
>> +{
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +}
>> static inline int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf)
>> {
>> return -ENODEV;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 12:12 [PATCH v5 00/11] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:41 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:31 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and cppc_perf_ctrls structs Sumit Gupta
2026-01-08 13:43 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 8:21 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:36 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ACPI: CPPC: Extend cppc_set_epp_perf() to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:39 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-16 15:59 ` Pierre Gondois
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 9:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 12:06 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:38 ` Sumit Gupta [this message]
2026-01-15 8:01 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-24 18:32 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-26 0:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2026-01-08 14:30 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when updating min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 13:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 13:53 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-15 8:20 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 2:55 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:21 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-15 8:57 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] cpufreq: CPPC: make scaling_min/max_freq read-only when auto_sel enabled Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 3:26 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:01 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-08 16:46 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-09 14:37 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-12 11:44 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-15 12:32 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-15 15:22 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-01-16 17:05 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-01-15 15:15 ` Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 8:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2026-01-08 14:04 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a2b7d49-bd1f-442e-9247-705cd2eb0d1c@nvidia.com \
--to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox