Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, dlatypov@google.com,
	davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
	cocci@inria.fr, smatch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, julia.lawall@inria.fr
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with discussion
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:23:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11f4750c6d4c175994dfd36d1ff385f68f61bd02.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>

Enhance the static analysis tools section with a discussion on when to
use each of them.

This was mainly taken from Dan Carpenter and Julia Lawall's comments on
the previous documentation patch for static analysis tools.

Lore: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20220329090911.GX3293@kadam/T/#mb97770c8e938095aadc3ee08f4ac7fe32ae386e6

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
index b5e02dd3fd94..91e479045d3a 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
@@ -146,3 +146,36 @@ Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst documentation page for details.
 
 Beware, though, that static analysis tools suffer from **false positives**.
 Errors and warns need to be evaluated carefully before attempting to fix them.
+
+When to use Sparse and Smatch
+-----------------------------
+
+Sparse is useful for type checking, detecting places that use ``__user``
+pointers improperly, or finding endianness bugs. Sparse runs much faster than
+Smatch.
+
+Smatch does flow analysis and, if allowed to build the function database, it
+also does cross function analysis. Smatch tries to answer questions like where
+is this buffer allocated? How big is it? Can this index be controlled by the
+user? Is this variable larger than that variable?
+
+It's generally easier to write checks in Smatch than it is to write checks in
+Sparse. Nevertheless, there are some overlaps between Sparse and Smatch checks
+because there is no reason for re-implementing Sparse's check in Smatch.
+
+Strong points of Smatch and Coccinelle
+--------------------------------------
+
+Coccinelle is probably the easiest for writing checks. It works before the
+pre-compiler so it's easier to check for bugs in macros using Coccinelle.
+Coccinelle also writes patches fixes for you which no other tool does.
+
+With Coccinelle you can do a mass conversion from
+``kmalloc(x * size, GFP_KERNEL)`` to ``kmalloc_array(x, size, GFP_KERNEL)``, and
+that's really useful. If you just created a Smatch warning and try to push the
+work of converting on to the maintainers they would be annoyed. You'd have to
+argue about each warning if can really overflow or not.
+
+Coccinelle does no analysis of variable values, which is the strong point of
+Smatch. On the other hand, Coccinelle allows you to do simple things in a simple
+way.
-- 
2.35.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 23:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: " Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:48   ` Daniel Latypov
2022-03-30  2:33   ` David Gow
2022-03-30  8:04   ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-29 23:23 ` Marcelo Schmitt [this message]
2022-03-30  2:48   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with discussion David Gow
2022-03-30  8:07     ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-30 19:30     ` Marcelo Schmitt
2022-04-01  0:18       ` David Gow
2022-03-31  8:14     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-01  0:19       ` David Gow
2022-03-30  8:06   ` Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11f4750c6d4c175994dfd36d1ff385f68f61bd02.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
    --to=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=smatch@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox