From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <m.wieczorretman@pm.me>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 07:51:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383b357-2a10-4b36-afb9-42e2724faa31@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219233600.154313-4-sohil.mehta@intel.com>
On 2/19/26 15:35, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> With LASS, these accesses are intercepted before the paging structures
> are traversed triggering a #GP instead of a #PF. The #GP doesn't provide
> much information in terms of the error code.
It's the error code and the address from CR2, right?
> However, as clarified in the SDM, the LASS violation only triggers after
> an instruction fetch happens from the vsyscall address. So, the faulting
> RIP, which is preserved in the user registers, can be used to determine
> if the #GP was triggered due to a vsyscall access in XONLY mode.
>
> Reuse the common emulation code during a #GP and emulate the vsyscall
> access in XONLY mode without going through complex instruction decoding.
> Note, this doesn't work for EMULATE mode which maps the vsyscall page as
> readable.
>
> Add an extra check in the common emulation code to ensure that the fault
> really happened in 64-bit user mode. This is primarily a sanity check
> with the #GP handler reusing the emulation code.
This part of the changelog loses me.
I _think_ this is trying to make the point that "emulate" mode is hard
with LASS. It's hard because it needs to be able to tell the difference
between a read of the vsyscall page and an instruction fetch from the
vsyscall page.
But, the "xonly" mode is far easier because reads are simply disallowed.
Any time userspace has an RIP pointing to the vsyscall page (with LASS
enabled), it's assumed to be a vsyscall. Any normal memory reads of the
vsyscall page get normal #GP handling.
Is that right?
BTW, reading it back now, I think the subject is really unfortunate. It
would be quite easy to read it and infer that this "adds
vsyscall=emulate for #GP".
It should probably be:
x86/vsyscall: Restore vsyscall=xonly mode under LASS
Maybe this structure would help, based around explaining the three
vsyscall= modes:
The vsyscall page is in the high/kernel part of the address
space. LASS prevents access to this page from userspace. The
kernel currently forces vsyscall=none mode with LASS.
Support vsyscall=xonly mode with LASS. <include more content
here>
Keep vsyscall=emulate mutually exclusive with LASS. It is hard
to support because the #GP handler (unlike #PF) doesn't have
PFEC or CR2 to give information about the fault.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-03 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 23:35 [PATCH 0/5] x86: Enable LASS support with vsyscall emulation Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the page fault emulation code Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/traps: Consolidate user fixups in the #GP handler Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 15:51 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2026-03-03 21:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 22:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05 0:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-05 1:45 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-05 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05 7:56 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-05 6:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/vsyscall: Disable LASS if vsyscall mode is set to EMULATE Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-19 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/cpu: Remove LASS restriction on vsyscall emulation Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 16:37 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-03 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: Enable LASS support with " Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383b357-2a10-4b36-afb9-42e2724faa31@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=m.wieczorretman@pm.me \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox