From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/5] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize isolated_cpus
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:47:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524145624-23655-6-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524145624-23655-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
The generate_sched_domains() function and the hotplug code are modified
to make them use the newly introduced isolated_cpus mask for schedule
domains generation.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d05c4c8..a67c77a 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -683,13 +683,14 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
int ndoms = 0; /* number of sched domains in result */
int nslot; /* next empty doms[] struct cpumask slot */
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
+ bool root_load_balance = is_sched_load_balance(&top_cpuset);
doms = NULL;
dattr = NULL;
csa = NULL;
/* Special case for the 99% of systems with one, full, sched domain */
- if (is_sched_load_balance(&top_cpuset)) {
+ if (root_load_balance && !top_cpuset.isolation_count) {
ndoms = 1;
doms = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms);
if (!doms)
@@ -712,6 +713,8 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
csn = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
+ if (root_load_balance)
+ csa[csn++] = &top_cpuset;
cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, &top_cpuset) {
if (cp == &top_cpuset)
continue;
@@ -722,6 +725,9 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
* parent's cpus, so just skip them, and then we call
* update_domain_attr_tree() to calc relax_domain_level of
* the corresponding sched domain.
+ *
+ * If root is load-balancing, we can skip @cp if it
+ * is a subset of the root's effective_cpus.
*/
if (!cpumask_empty(cp->cpus_allowed) &&
!(is_sched_load_balance(cp) &&
@@ -729,6 +735,10 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN))))
continue;
+ if (root_load_balance &&
+ cpumask_subset(cp->cpus_allowed, top_cpuset.effective_cpus))
+ continue;
+
if (is_sched_load_balance(cp))
csa[csn++] = cp;
@@ -820,6 +830,12 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
}
BUG_ON(nslot != ndoms);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL
+ for (i = 0; i < ndoms; i++)
+ pr_info("rebuild_sched_domains dom %d: %*pbl\n", i,
+ cpumask_pr_args(doms[i]));
+#endif
+
done:
kfree(csa);
@@ -860,7 +876,12 @@ static void rebuild_sched_domains_locked(void)
* passing doms with offlined cpu to partition_sched_domains().
* Anyways, hotplug work item will rebuild sched domains.
*/
- if (!cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
+ if (!top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
+ !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (top_cpuset.isolation_count &&
+ !cpumask_subset(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask))
goto out;
/* Generate domain masks and attrs */
@@ -1102,6 +1123,7 @@ static int update_isolated_cpumask(const char *buf)
top_cpuset.isolation_count = cpumask_weight(top_cpuset.isolated_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
+ rebuild_sched_domains_locked();
out_ok:
retval = 0;
@@ -2530,6 +2552,11 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
cpumask_copy(&new_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
new_mems = node_states[N_MEMORY];
+ /*
+ * If isolated_cpus is populated, it is likely that the check below
+ * will produce a false positive on cpus_updated when the cpu list
+ * isn't changed. It is extra work, but it is better to be safe.
+ */
cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, &new_cpus);
mems_updated = !nodes_equal(top_cpuset.effective_mems, new_mems);
@@ -2538,6 +2565,10 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
if (!on_dfl)
cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, &new_cpus);
+
+ if (top_cpuset.isolation_count)
+ cpumask_andnot(&new_cpus, &new_cpus,
+ top_cpuset.isolated_cpus);
cpumask_copy(top_cpuset.effective_cpus, &new_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
/* we don't mess with cpumasks of tasks in top_cpuset */
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 13:46 [PATCH v7 0/5] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2018-04-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] " Waiman Long
2018-04-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] cpuset: Add cpuset.sched_load_balance to v2 Waiman Long
2018-05-02 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 13:29 ` Waiman Long
2018-05-02 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 13:47 ` Waiman Long
2018-05-02 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 14:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] cpuset: Add a root-only cpus.isolated v2 control file Waiman Long
2018-04-23 15:56 ` Juri Lelli
2018-05-02 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-08 0:30 ` Waiman Long
2018-04-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] cpuset: Restrict load balancing off cpus to subset of cpus.isolated Waiman Long
2018-05-01 19:51 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-01 20:33 ` Waiman Long
2018-05-01 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-01 21:31 ` Waiman Long
2018-04-19 13:47 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-04-20 8:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Mike Galbraith
2018-04-23 16:32 ` Waiman Long
2018-04-23 13:07 ` Juri Lelli
2018-04-23 13:57 ` Juri Lelli
2018-04-23 14:10 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524145624-23655-6-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).