From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
luto@amacapital.net, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 4/9] cpuset: Allow changes to cpus in a partition root
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:41:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1535380884-31308-5-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1535380884-31308-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
The previous patch introduces a new partition flag, but won't allow
changes made to "cpuset.cpus" once the flag is on. That may be too
restrictive in some use cases. So this restiction is now relaxed to
allow changes made to the "cpuset.cpus" file with some constraints:
1) The new set of cpus must still be exclusive.
2) Newly added cpus must be a subset of the parent effective_cpus.
3) None of the deleted cpus can be one of those allocated to a child
partition roots, if present.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 9 +++++
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index 5e33d25..a5fc335 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1701,6 +1701,15 @@ Cpuset Interface Files
its child partition root cgroups. There must be at least one cpu
left in the parent partition root cgroup.
+ In a partition root, changes to "cpuset.cpus" is allowed as long
+ as the first condition above as well as the following two
+ additional conditions are true.
+
+ 1) Any added CPUs must be a proper subset of the parent's
+ "cpuset.cpus.effective".
+ 2) No CPU that has been distributed to child partition roots is
+ is deleted.
+
Device controller
-----------------
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d9e821c..56e0931 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -957,6 +957,9 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cpumask_copy(cp->effective_cpus, new_cpus);
+ if (cp->nr_reserved)
+ cpumask_andnot(cp->effective_cpus, cp->effective_cpus,
+ cp->reserved_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
WARN_ON(!is_in_v2_mode() &&
@@ -984,8 +987,8 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
/**
* update_reserved_cpumask - update the reserved_cpus mask of parent cpuset
* @cpuset: The cpuset that requests CPU reservation
- * @delmask: The old reserved cpumask to be removed from the parent
- * @addmask: The new reserved cpumask to be added to the parent
+ * @oldmask: The old reserved cpumask to be removed from the parent
+ * @newmask: The new reserved cpumask to be added to the parent
* Return: 0 if successful, an error code otherwise
*
* Removing CPUs from a partition root may not be allowed by the
@@ -1001,15 +1004,17 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
* cpumask changes tht violates the cpu exclusivity rule will not be
* permitted.
*
- * If the sched.partition flag changes, either the delmask (0=>1) or the
- * addmask (1=>0) will be NULL.
+ * If the sched.partition flag changes, either the oldmask (0=>1) or the
+ * newmask (1=>0) will be NULL.
*
* Called with cpuset_mutex held.
*/
static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
- struct cpumask *delmask, struct cpumask *addmask)
+ struct cpumask *oldmask, struct cpumask *newmask)
{
int retval;
+ int adding, deleting;
+ cpumask_var_t addmask, delmask;
struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cpuset);
int old_count = parent->nr_reserved;
@@ -1018,16 +1023,23 @@ static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
* The new cpumask, if present, must not be empty.
*/
if (!is_partition_root(parent) ||
- (addmask && cpumask_empty(addmask)))
+ (newmask && cpumask_empty(newmask)))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* A sched.partition state change is not allowed if there are
* online children.
*/
- if (css_has_online_children(&cpuset->css))
+ if ((!oldmask || !newmask) && css_has_online_children(&cpuset->css))
return -EBUSY;
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&addmask, GFP_KERNEL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&delmask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+ free_cpumask_var(addmask);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
if (!old_count) {
if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&parent->reserved_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1037,12 +1049,29 @@ static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
}
retval = -EBUSY;
+ adding = deleting = false;
+ /*
+ * addmask = newmask & ~oldmask
+ * delmask = oldmask & ~newmask
+ */
+ if (oldmask && newmask) {
+ adding = cpumask_andnot(addmask, newmask, oldmask);
+ deleting = cpumask_andnot(delmask, oldmask, newmask);
+ if (!adding && !deleting)
+ goto out_ok;
+ } else if (newmask) {
+ adding = true;
+ cpumask_copy(addmask, newmask);
+ } else if (oldmask) {
+ deleting = true;
+ cpumask_copy(delmask, oldmask);
+ }
/*
* The cpus to be added must be a proper subset of the parent's
* effective_cpus mask but not in the reserved_cpus mask.
*/
- if (addmask) {
+ if (adding) {
if (!cpumask_subset(addmask, parent->effective_cpus) ||
cpumask_equal(addmask, parent->effective_cpus))
goto out;
@@ -1057,13 +1086,13 @@ static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
* and newly deleted ones will be added back if they are online.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
- if (addmask) {
+ if (adding) {
cpumask_or(parent->reserved_cpus,
parent->reserved_cpus, addmask);
cpumask_andnot(parent->effective_cpus,
parent->effective_cpus, addmask);
}
- if (delmask) {
+ if (deleting) {
cpumask_andnot(parent->reserved_cpus,
parent->reserved_cpus, delmask);
cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus,
@@ -1072,8 +1101,12 @@ static int update_reserved_cpumask(struct cpuset *cpuset,
parent->nr_reserved = cpumask_weight(parent->reserved_cpus);
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
+
+out_ok:
retval = 0;
out:
+ free_cpumask_var(addmask);
+ free_cpumask_var(delmask);
if (old_count && !parent->nr_reserved)
free_cpumask_var(parent->reserved_cpus);
@@ -1121,8 +1154,12 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (retval < 0)
return retval;
- if (is_partition_root(cs))
- return -EBUSY;
+ if (is_partition_root(cs)) {
+ retval = update_reserved_cpumask(cs, cs->cpus_allowed,
+ trialcs->cpus_allowed);
+ if (retval < 0)
+ return retval;
+ }
spin_lock_irq(&callback_lock);
cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-27 14:41 [PATCH v12 0/9] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 1/9] " Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 2/9] cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.partition flag Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 3/9] cpuset: Simulate auto-off of sched.partition at cgroup removal Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 5/9] cpuset: Make sure that partition flag work properly with CPU hotplug Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 6/9] cpuset: Make generate_sched_domains() recognize reserved_cpus Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 7/9] cpuset: Expose cpus.effective and mems.effective on cgroup v2 root Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 8/9] cpuset: Don't rebuild sched domains if cpu changes in non-partition root Waiman Long
2018-08-27 14:41 ` [PATCH v12 9/9] cpuset: Support forced turning off of partition flag Waiman Long
2018-08-27 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-27 17:50 ` Waiman Long
2018-09-06 21:20 ` Waiman Long
2018-09-24 15:47 ` Waiman Long
2018-10-02 20:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-10-02 20:44 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1535380884-31308-5-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).