From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D1DC433EF for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241377AbiFNBsa (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:48:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234470AbiFNBs2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:48:28 -0400 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD63C2AE33; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 18:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C809CE1763; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70C7EC3411E; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:48:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1655171303; bh=kHVpMpq++uoILG8nEpsnJIRDObfNN0ura8aEr/40J5g=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=PHLniVGe96eCVgQd6i8SCb2VQ8SV2TbyBAvvsjPqz+jBf0JxbnHKYBXaBJgAin57x l23HXLkgQiLI1XRR9uTlcpitTheTlSWA01VSo/6F8MU/7SbitF6DvTOJW16KsjlUZr L2SATQZ6jbpEzm53tWAXBk48vhfthzhWfSfQiubKyxynPTycF5CwGEZyuQYSHlh+dY dpfuZXLECuvU6XTTZPJvUW/SZxr96ZaNDzeDzRdEB/iANHSDdEnoj8RljdoauDMEe6 Vxzdc+FvG3dCMN9lcfhmc5tXsxxJzw++7El1+Vbm4pv3JmQKOAg/Y5xkMOzskV7SuF yaZRfrhieTW3Q== Message-ID: <1544ed72-0865-6cff-e9fa-02a1eb1ed50d@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:48:17 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: filesystems: f2fs: fix description about compress ioctl Content-Language: en-US To: Jonathan Corbet , Chao Liu , Matthew Wilcox Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yue Hu , Wayne Zhang , Chao Liu References: <20220613020800.3379482-1-chaoliu719@gmail.com> <87czfc1nr8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: <87czfc1nr8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On 2022/6/14 1:23, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Chao Liu writes: > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:37:01AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 10:08:00AM +0800, Chao Liu wrote: >>>> v2: >>>> - s/file size/filesize/ >>> >>> Why would you change it to be wrong? >>> >> >> This is a suggestion from Chao Yu. Maybe he has some other considerations. > > Sorry, I should have replied to that. I disagree with that suggestion. > "Filesize" is not an English word, and there doesn't seem to be any > reason to use it in our docs. My bad, out of mind at that time, sorry for my wrong suggestion... > > > > We have to occurrences now - one already in the f2fs docs. I think we > shouldn't add more. So my plan is to apply the first version of this > patch. Chao Liu: is there a reason why you didn't add the Reviewed-by > from Chao Yu in the second version? Chao Yu: is that tag still > applicable even without the "filesize" change? Yes. Thanks, > > Thanks, > > jon