Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@meta.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>, <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] mm/memory-failure: surface unhandlable kernel pages as -ENOTRECOVERABLE
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 20:22:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157b0e23-9f1e-1af2-bb44-44f1f2cab8a5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-ecc_panic-v10-2-c6ed5b62eea2@debian.org>

On 2026/6/30 20:46, Breno Leitao wrote:
> get_any_page() collapses every HWPoisonHandlable() rejection into a
> single -EIO via the __get_hwpoison_page() -> -EBUSY -> shake_page()
> -> retry path.  That is correct for the transient case (a userspace
> folio briefly off LRU during migration or compaction, which a later
> shake can drag back), but wrong for stable kernel-owned pages: slab,
> page-table, large-kmalloc and PG_reserved pages will never become
> HWPoisonHandlable(), so the retry loop is wasted work and the final
> -EIO loses the "this is structurally unrecoverable" information.
> memory_failure() then maps -EIO into MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, which the
> panic-on-unrecoverable sysctl deliberately does not act on.
> 
> Introduce is_kernel_owned_page(), a small predicate that positively
> identifies pages the hwpoison handler cannot recover from:
> 
>   is_kernel_owned_page(p) :=
>       PageReserved(p) ||
>       PageSlab(head) || PageTable(head) || PageLargeKmalloc(head)
> 
>   where head = compound_head(p).
> 
> PG_reserved is a per-page flag (PF_NO_COMPOUND) and is tested on the
> page directly.  The slab, page-table and large-kmalloc page-type bits
> are only stored on the head page, so those tests resolve the compound
> head first, then re-read compound_head(page) afterwards: a concurrent
> split or compound free that moves head invalidates the just-read flags
> and the loop retries.  The lookup still takes no refcount, mirroring
> the rest of get_any_page(); the recheck closes the common split race,
> and a residual free->alloc->free in the same window can only mis-tag
> a genuinely poisoned page, never reclassify a handlable one.
> 
> No MF_SOFT_OFFLINE / page_has_movable_ops() opt-out is needed: a
> movable_ops page is always PageOffline or PageZsmalloc, whose
> page_type is mutually exclusive with slab, page-table and
> large-kmalloc, and it never carries PG_reserved, so it can never
> match any of the checks above.
> 
> The list is intentionally not exhaustive.  vmalloc and kernel-stack
> pages, for example, do not carry a page_type bit and would need a
> different oracle; they keep going through the existing retry path
> unchanged.  This is the smallest set we can identify with certainty
> by page type.
> 
> Wire the helper into the top of get_any_page() to short-circuit
> those pages before the retry loop runs.  On a hit, drop the caller's
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED reference (if any) and return -ENOTRECOVERABLE
> straight away.  Pages outside the helper's positive list still take
> the existing retry path and return -EIO, leaving operator-visible
> behaviour for those cases unchanged.
> 
> Extend the unhandlable-page pr_err() to fire for either errno and
> update the get_hwpoison_page() kerneldoc to document the new return.
> 
> memory_failure() still folds every negative return into
> MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON via its existing "else if (res < 0)" branch, so
> this patch on its own only changes the errno that soft_offline_page()
> can propagate to its callers.  A follow-up wires -ENOTRECOVERABLE
> through memory_failure() and reports MF_MSG_KERNEL for the
> unrecoverable cases, which is what the
> panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl observes.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index f4d3e6e20e13f..087658484e242 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,38 @@ static inline bool HWPoisonHandlable(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
>  	return PageLRU(page) || is_free_buddy_page(page);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Positive identification of pages the hwpoison handler cannot recover:
> + * pages owned by kernel internals with no userspace mapping to unmap, no
> + * file mapping to invalidate, and no migration target.
> + */
> +static inline bool is_kernel_owned_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	struct page *head;
> +	bool kernel_owned;
> +
> +	/* PG_reserved is a per-page flag, never set on a compound page. */
> +	if (PageReserved(page))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Page-type bits live only on the head page, so resolve any tail
> +	 * first.  The check takes no refcount; recheck the head afterwards
> +	 * so a concurrent split or compound free cannot leave us trusting
> +	 * a stale view.  A residual free->alloc->free cannot be closed here
> +	 * (frozen slab and large-kmalloc pages cannot be pinned), but is
> +	 * harmless: where a wrong verdict could panic, memory_failure() has
> +	 * already set PageHWPoison, which bars the page from the allocator.
> +	 */
> +retry:
> +	head = compound_head(page);

It's irrelevant to this issue but should we use folio?
Anyway, this patch looks good to me.

Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>

Thanks.
.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 12:46 [PATCH v10 0/6] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] mm/memory-failure: drop dead error_states[] entry for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] mm/memory-failure: surface unhandlable kernel pages as -ENOTRECOVERABLE Breno Leitao
2026-07-06 12:22   ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for unrecoverable kernel pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao
2026-06-30 12:46 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] selftests/mm: add hwpoison-panic destructive test Breno Leitao
2026-07-04  9:31   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-07-06 16:14     ` Breno Leitao
2026-07-06 16:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-30 20:55 ` [PATCH v10 0/6] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-26 15:33 Breno Leitao
2026-06-26 15:33 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] mm/memory-failure: surface unhandlable kernel pages as -ENOTRECOVERABLE Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157b0e23-9f1e-1af2-bb44-44f1f2cab8a5@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox