From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"ardb@kernel.org" <ardb@kernel.org>,
"david.laight.linux@gmail.com" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"jpoimboe@kernel.org" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"dwmw@amazon.co.uk" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"vegard.nossum@oracle.com" <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
"xin@zytor.com" <xin@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"kees@kernel.org" <kees@kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/15] x86/cpu: Defer CR pinning enforcement until late_initcall()
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 17:23:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171d197d80701224b83e707948ae5e0a33e27b28.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251007065119.148605-6-sohil.mehta@intel.com>
On Mon, 2025-10-06 at 23:51 -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> Problem
> -------
> In order to map the EFI runtime services, set_virtual_address_map()
> needs to be called, which resides in the lower half of the address
> space. This means that LASS needs to be temporarily disabled around this
> call.
Possibly naive EFI question...
efi_runtime_services_32_t has:
typedef struct {
efi_table_hdr_t hdr;
u32 get_time;
u32 set_time;
u32 get_wakeup_time;
u32 set_wakeup_time;
u32 set_virtual_address_map;
u32 convert_pointer;
u32 get_variable;
u32 get_next_variable;
u32 set_variable;
u32 get_next_high_mono_count;
u32 reset_system;
u32 update_capsule;
u32 query_capsule_caps;
u32 query_variable_info;
} efi_runtime_services_32_t;
Why is only set_virtual_address_map problematic? Some of the other ones get
called after boot by a bunch of modules by the looks of it.
>
> Wrapping efi_enter_virtual_mode() with lass_stac()/clac() is not enough,
> because the AC flag only gates data accesses, not instruction fetches.
> Clearing the CR4.LASS bit is required to make this work.
>
> However, pinned CR4 bits are not expected to be modified after
> boot CPU init, resulting in a kernel warning.
>
> Solution
> --------
> One option is to move the CR pinning setup immediately after the runtime
> services have been mapped. However, that is a narrow fix that would
> require revisiting if something else needs to modify a pinned CR bit.
>
> CR pinning mainly prevents exploits from trivially modifying
> security-sensitive CR bits. There is limited benefit to enabling CR
> pinning before userspace comes up. Defer CR pinning enforcement until
> late_initcall() to allow EFI and future users to modify the CR bits
> without any concern for CR pinning.
>
> Save the pinned bits while initializing the boot CPU because they are
> needed later to program the value on APs when they come up.
>
> Note
> ----
> This introduces a small window between the boot CPU being initialized
> and CR pinning being enforced, where any in-kernel clearing of the
> pinned bits could go unnoticed. Later, when enforcement begins, a
> warning is triggered as soon as any CR4 bit is modified, such as
> X86_CR4_PGE during a TLB flush.
>
> Currently, this is a purely theoretical concern. There are multiple ways
> to resolve it [1] if it becomes a problem in practice.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c59aa7ac-62a6-45ec-b626-de518b25f7d9@intel.com/ [1]
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
> ---
> v10:
> - Split recording pinned bits and enabling pinning into two functions.
> - Defer pinning until userspace comes up.
>
> This patch does not include any changes to harden the CR pinning
> implementation, as that is beyond the scope of this series.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 61ab332eaf73..57d5824465b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -476,8 +476,8 @@ void cr4_init(void)
>
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PCID))
> cr4 |= X86_CR4_PCIDE;
> - if (static_branch_likely(&cr_pinning))
> - cr4 = (cr4 & ~cr4_pinned_mask) | cr4_pinned_bits;
> +
> + cr4 = (cr4 & ~cr4_pinned_mask) | cr4_pinned_bits;
Can you explain why this change is needed? It relies on cr4_pinned_bits to be
already set, and kind of is "enforcement", but no longer depends on
enable_cr_pinning() being called.
>
> __write_cr4(cr4);
>
> @@ -487,14 +487,21 @@ void cr4_init(void)
>
> /*
> * Once CPU feature detection is finished (and boot params have been
> - * parsed), record any of the sensitive CR bits that are set, and
> - * enable CR pinning.
> + * parsed), record any of the sensitive CR bits that are set.
> */
> -static void __init setup_cr_pinning(void)
> +static void __init record_cr_pinned_bits(void)
> {
> cr4_pinned_bits = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4) & cr4_pinned_mask;
> +}
> +
> +/* Enables enforcement of the CR pinned bits */
> +static int __init enable_cr_pinning(void)
> +{
> static_key_enable(&cr_pinning.key);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> +late_initcall(enable_cr_pinning);
>
> static __init int x86_nofsgsbase_setup(char *arg)
> {
> @@ -2119,7 +2126,7 @@ static __init void identify_boot_cpu(void)
> enable_sep_cpu();
> #endif
> cpu_detect_tlb(&boot_cpu_data);
> - setup_cr_pinning();
> + record_cr_pinned_bits();
>
> tsx_init();
> tdx_init();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-07 6:51 [PATCH v10 00/15] x86: Enable Linear Address Space Separation support Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 01/15] x86/cpu: Enumerate the LASS feature bits Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:19 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 18:28 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-07 20:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 20:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 20:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-16 3:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-07 20:49 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 23:16 ` Xin Li
2025-10-08 16:00 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-16 15:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 18:03 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 02/15] x86/asm: Introduce inline memcpy and memset Sohil Mehta
2025-10-21 12:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 13:48 ` David Laight
2025-10-21 18:06 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 03/15] x86/alternatives: Disable LASS when patching kernel alternatives Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 16:55 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 16:22 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 17:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-21 20:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-21 20:55 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-22 9:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-22 19:49 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-22 20:03 ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-22 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-22 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 10:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 04/15] x86/cpu: Set LASS CR4 bit as pinning sensitive Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:24 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 23:11 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 16:52 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 19:03 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 05/15] x86/cpu: Defer CR pinning enforcement until late_initcall() Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:23 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2025-10-07 23:05 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:36 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-10 20:45 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-15 21:17 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-17 19:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 06/15] x86/efi: Disable LASS while mapping the EFI runtime services Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 07/15] x86/kexec: Disable LASS during relocate kernel Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:43 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:33 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 08/15] x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the page fault emulation code Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:37 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 18:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-10-07 19:53 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:52 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-30 16:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 17:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-10-30 17:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2025-10-30 19:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-30 21:37 ` David Laight
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 09/15] x86/traps: Consolidate user fixups in exc_general_protection() Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 17:46 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 22:41 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-10-08 17:43 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 10/15] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 11/15] x86/vsyscall: Disable LASS if vsyscall mode is set to EMULATE Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:43 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 12/15] x86/traps: Communicate a LASS violation in #GP message Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:07 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 13/15] x86/traps: Generalize #GP address decode and hint code Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:43 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 14/15] x86/traps: Provide additional hints for a kernel stack segment fault Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 6:51 ` [PATCH v10 15/15] x86/cpu: Enable LASS by default during CPU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-10-07 18:42 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH v10 00/15] x86: Enable Linear Address Space Separation support Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-10-17 19:52 ` Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171d197d80701224b83e707948ae5e0a33e27b28.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).