Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] mm/memory-failure: surface unhandlable kernel pages as -ENOTRECOVERABLE
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 16:41:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174b8d76-5514-4942-af5d-c975ff95ee03@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-ecc_panic-v9-2-432a74002e74@debian.org>

On 6/9/26 12:56, Breno Leitao wrote:
> get_any_page() collapses every HWPoisonHandlable() rejection into a
> single -EIO via the __get_hwpoison_page() -> -EBUSY -> shake_page()
> -> retry path.  That is correct for the transient case (a userspace
> folio briefly off LRU during migration or compaction, which a later
> shake can drag back), but wrong for stable kernel-owned pages: slab,
> page-table, large-kmalloc and PG_reserved pages will never become
> HWPoisonHandlable(), so the retry loop is wasted work and the final
> -EIO loses the "this is structurally unrecoverable" information.
> memory_failure() then maps -EIO into MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, which the
> panic-on-unrecoverable sysctl deliberately does not act on.
> 
> Introduce HWPoisonKernelOwned(), a small predicate that positively
> identifies pages the hwpoison handler cannot recover from:
> 
>   HWPoisonKernelOwned(p, flags) :=
>       !(MF_SOFT_OFFLINE && page_has_movable_ops(p)) &&
>       (PageReserved(p) ||
>        PageSlab(head) || PageTable(head) || PageLargeKmalloc(head))
> 
>   where head = compound_head(p).
> 
> PG_reserved is a per-page flag (PF_NO_COMPOUND) and is tested on the
> page directly.  The slab, page-table and large-kmalloc page-type bits
> are only stored on the head page, so those tests resolve the compound
> head first, then re-read compound_head(page) afterwards: a concurrent
> split or compound free that moves head invalidates the just-read flags
> and the loop retries.  The lookup still takes no refcount, mirroring
> the rest of get_any_page(); the recheck closes the common split race,
> and a residual free->alloc->free in the same window can only mis-tag
> a genuinely poisoned page, never reclassify a handlable one.
> 
> The MF_SOFT_OFFLINE / page_has_movable_ops() opt-out mirrors the
> same exception in HWPoisonHandlable(): soft-offline is allowed to
> migrate movable_ops pages even though they are not on the LRU, and
> we must not pre-empt that with an unrecoverable verdict.
> 
> The list is intentionally not exhaustive.  vmalloc and kernel-stack
> pages, for example, do not carry a page_type bit and would need a
> different oracle; they keep going through the existing retry path
> unchanged.  This is the smallest set we can identify with certainty
> by page type.
> 
> Wire the helper into the top of get_any_page() to short-circuit
> those pages before the retry loop runs.  On a hit, drop the caller's
> MF_COUNT_INCREASED reference (if any) and return -ENOTRECOVERABLE
> straight away.  Pages outside the helper's positive list still take
> the existing retry path and return -EIO, leaving operator-visible
> behaviour for those cases unchanged.
> 
> Extend the unhandlable-page pr_err() to fire for either errno and
> update the get_hwpoison_page() kerneldoc to document the new return.
> 
> memory_failure() still folds every negative return into
> MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON via its existing "else if (res < 0)" branch, so
> this patch on its own only changes the errno that soft_offline_page()
> can propagate to its callers.  A follow-up wires -ENOTRECOVERABLE
> through memory_failure() and reports MF_MSG_KERNEL for the
> unrecoverable cases, which is what the
> panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl observes.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index f4d3e6e20e13..eed9de387694 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,46 @@ static inline bool HWPoisonHandlable(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
>  	return PageLRU(page) || is_free_buddy_page(page);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Positive identification of pages the hwpoison handler cannot recover.
> + * These page types are owned by kernel internals (no userspace mapping
> + * to unmap, no file mapping to invalidate, no migration target), so the
> + * shake_page() / retry loop in get_any_page() can never turn them into
> + * something HWPoisonHandlable() will accept.  Short-circuit them to
> + * -ENOTRECOVERABLE so callers can panic on operator request instead of
> + * spinning through retries that exit as a transient-looking -EIO.
> + *
> + * The MF_SOFT_OFFLINE / page_has_movable_ops() opt-out mirrors
> + * HWPoisonHandlable(): soft-offline is allowed to migrate movable_ops
> + * pages even though they are not on the LRU.
> + */
> +static inline bool HWPoisonKernelOwned(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	struct page *head;
> +
> +	if ((flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE) && page_has_movable_ops(page))
> +		return false;
> +

On a second look: Do we really need that? The page types below never support
migration. So I guess that check is not required?

Apart from that, looks good with two comments:

a) HWPoisonKernelOwned: this is not the common style for us to name functions.

is_kernel_owned_page() or sth like that would do.

b) The function doc can likely be simplified a bit. No need to mention the
short-circuit stuff, for example, IMHO.

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 10:56 [PATCH v9 0/6] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 10:56 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] mm/memory-failure: drop dead error_states[] entry for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 10:56 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] mm/memory-failure: surface unhandlable kernel pages as -ENOTRECOVERABLE Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 14:41   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-06-09 16:15     ` Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 18:41       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-09 10:56 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for unrecoverable kernel pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 10:56 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 10:56 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao
2026-06-09 10:57 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] selftests/mm: add hwpoison-panic destructive test Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174b8d76-5514-4942-af5d-c975ff95ee03@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox