From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Fixes and cleanups for cpu-feature-registers.rst
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:00:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178507570719.3401780.18017279270109471777.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702-arm64-cpu-ftr-regs-v2-0-fe0b78f1bd93@kernel.org>
On Thu, 02 Jul 2026 20:11:15 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Peter Maydell noticed some missing updates to cpu-feature-registers.rst,
> while looking at these a number of other other omissions and some
> maintainability problems were observed. Several registers and many
> bitfields have not been added.
>
> Following discussion with Catalin we remove the numbering of the
> registers in the first patch so that when we add the registers we can
> add them in a roughly sorted order, then fix up the missing
> documentation before sorting the existing entries in the file.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/cpufeature), thanks!
[1/4] arm64: Don't number registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/b6bd4d1a5b6c
[2/4] arm64: Document missing bitfields in cpu-feature-registers.rst
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/4788adeca0e0
[3/4] arm64: Sort registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/21a2ca869edd
[4/4] arm64: Remove hidden bitfields from cpu-feature-registers.rst
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/bc7f7ddc64df
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 19:11 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64: Fixes and cleanups for cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-07-02 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: Don't number registers in cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-07-02 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Document missing bitfields " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Sort registers " Mark Brown
2026-07-02 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Remove hidden bitfields from cpu-feature-registers.rst Mark Brown
2026-07-26 15:00 ` Will Deacon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178507570719.3401780.18017279270109471777.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox