From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
nb@tipi-net.de, corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] docs: netdev: additional info requirements for bug fixes
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 01:20:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179090401158.3168550.5697609746965304897.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930163109.3910509-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:31:09 -0700 you wrote:
> Knowing how AI-generated patches were tested would be a great help
> when reviewing them. Explicitly ask people to describe the discovery
> and validation process they followed.
>
> I posted this as an RFC a while back and there were some concerns
> from developers that it would gum up the process. With Linus's
> recent complaints about the size of our PRs, we really need
> this information. I launched an AI bot which complains if
> people don't explain how bugs were discovered and tested
> (look for netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, s=series info).
> We need to document this requirement.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2] docs: netdev: additional info requirements for bug fixes
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/fe8a42931853
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 16:31 [PATCH net-next v2] docs: netdev: additional info requirements for bug fixes Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-30 18:41 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-01 7:33 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-02 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179090401158.3168550.5697609746965304897.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox