From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180419135544.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180419084245.17096-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 05:42:44PM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Example code snippets for necessary of READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() has
> an unnecessary line of code and wrong condition. This commit fixes
> them.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>
Good catch!!! I queued and pushed both patches for further review,
thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> index fce929144ccd..4ea4af71e68a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ If the compiler can prove that do_something() does not store to the
> variable a, then the compiler is within its rights transforming this to
> the following::
>
> - tmp = a;
> if (a > 0)
> for (;;)
> do_something();
> @@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ the following::
> If you don't want the compiler to do this (and you probably don't), then
> you should use something like the following::
>
> - while (READ_ONCE(a) < 0)
> + while (READ_ONCE(a) > 0)
> do_something();
>
> Alternatively, you could place a barrier() call in the loop.
> --
> 2.13.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 8:42 [PATCH 1/2] atomic_ops.rst: Fix wrong example code SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 8:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] atomic_ops.rst: Use `warning` rst directive SeongJae Park
2018-04-19 13:55 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180419135544.GA26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).