From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317B57D09E for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751517AbeE3Otg (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 10:49:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:41287 "EHLO mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751191AbeE3Otf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2018 10:49:35 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f195.google.com with SMTP id u12-v6so29803229wrn.8 for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 07:49:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IDgA5K7I0GxeyPvD9JfEgpIr3ANxC6/6aIkueI4vNwo=; b=Hrfkxg31ej5tRBrYftpB7MyijsifMBxHdDH9bgNv0ghbE12nqZXQ8GreI4LyfpWJNr 8Hn3kaMwPqWQ2IRyJPSi/5f8pUovhgf9UkEBX1kjb5TNGLE+pVyA/adrb+ooHnZ6xwQD oE0RF6tHkGYkLQU8YKSzWHW4rraGP456SsAxo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IDgA5K7I0GxeyPvD9JfEgpIr3ANxC6/6aIkueI4vNwo=; b=iWXrSfQ21cNoFTjJSfAUnoCWCT0qaT8p0w5vkFkq9uVcJeulul73yR5JN2LEZ4fVAR 2qTup1xzmnNd2NXFMCIN+Ze/LAzrY+cGIlFYBV7jBjwYdFygb1riELfSyqITeTTOGBfL K5zkKIaGZjaHImFkvcj0P/pGlQ/ysaPDp9bvs0uzL7mLYaYVjUb2dtK1rWpTWnjTt6sB MREHG3z+1dSIZZHltV0vBLXuzhaVHhGKFLWhUI0klMS8yEmUcX6jVeKM6wSuQl6VbAee EIwRSbSojLP2FRZ2W6Cr28FedvPvWYtYowx+dxt6CGY6ObhccuL4urXZuF7Z65Xsqn8P q/7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdpY0bVBB4RTCNJHByxDwpftiZS+rhGj5VL5HIpzS4yT0Au++D4 nljDrHnYLUgzpuDBjex2mcFb9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKSTubaVRa9sPmSV9WHe/dfvnk8JU/3gzx/MJL3x8Wt9gnq2icN/x96jNZyeagW8ixtw/XphA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8607:: with SMTP id 7-v6mr2310922wrv.255.1527691774395; Wed, 30 May 2018 07:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leoy-ThinkPad-X240s ([45.76.138.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k36-v6sm12133580wrc.20.2018.05.30.07.49.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 May 2018 07:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 22:49:22 +0800 From: Leo Yan To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jonathan Corbet , Robert Walker , Mike Leach , Kim Phillips , Tor Jeremiassen , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-arm-kernel , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , coresight@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFT v3 1/4] perf cs-etm: Generate branch sample for missed packets Message-ID: <20180530144922.GB12368@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> References: <1527497103-3593-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <1527497103-3593-2-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20180528221347.GA4109@xps15> <20180529002538.GA11317@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> <20180530002837.GB11923@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:45:46AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 29 May 2018 at 18:28, Leo Yan wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:04:49AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >> > As now this patch is big with more complex logic, so I consider to > >> > split it into small patches: > >> > > >> > - Define CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR; > >> > - Fix for CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet; > >> > - Fix for exception packet; > >> > > >> > Does this make sense for you? I have concern that this patch is a > >> > fixing patch, so not sure after spliting patches will introduce > >> > trouble for applying them for other stable kernels ... > >> > >> Reverse the order: > >> > >> - Fix for CS_ETM_TRACE_ON packet; > >> - Fix for exception packet; > >> - Define CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR; > >> > >> But you may not need to - see next comment. > > > > From the discussion context, I think here 'you may not need to' is > > referring to my concern for applying patches on stable kernel, so I > > should take this patch series as an enhancement and don't need to > > consider much for stable kernel. > > Yes, that is what I meant. Thanks for confirmation, will send new patch series according to the discussion. [...] Thanks, Leo Yan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html