From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3ED7D048 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752029AbeGJL2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:28:38 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:33208 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751527AbeGJL2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 07:28:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E77657DA; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 05:28:35 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Greg KH Cc: David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Randy Dunlap , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] docs, debugfs: start explicit debugfs documentation Message-ID: <20180710052835.581cdf28@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180710064506.GA2316@kroah.com> References: <20180710064506.GA2316@kroah.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 08:45:06 +0200 Greg KH wrote: > For the "this is what a specific debugfs file contains", those should go > into Documenation/ABI/ if you really want to document those types of > things. Do we really want to start populating Documentation/ABI with stuff that's explicitly *not* ABI? Keeping it separate might make more sense, IMO. I'd put extfrag_index with the MM docs, for example. > But as it is, this single patch does too many different things all at > once. ...and yet not enough :) This stuff is almost in RST already, it would be nice to go all the way and integrate it into the rest of our docs. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html