From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4139C7D071 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728000AbeGRRjm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:39:42 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49488 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727575AbeGRRjm (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:39:42 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6IGsWtX021347 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:00:53 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ka6fj0nqt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:00:52 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:00:50 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:00:47 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w6IH0kjx31195240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:00:46 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9903E42054; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:01:04 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF71842047; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:01:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.204.179]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:01:03 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:00:43 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Jonathan Corbet , Andrew Morton Cc: Randy Dunlap , linux-doc , linux-mm , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs References: <1530370506-21751-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180702113255.1f7504e2@lwn.net> <20180718114730.GD4302@rapoport-lnx> <20180718060249.6b45605d@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180718060249.6b45605d@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18071817-4275-0000-0000-0000029A9775 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18071817-4276-0000-0000-000037A2B637 Message-Id: <20180718170043.GA23770@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-07-18_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807180187 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org (added Andrew) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:02:49AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:47:30 +0300 > Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > So this seems like good stuff overall. It digs pretty deeply into the mm > > > code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an > > > mm developer. Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to > > > pick the set up. > > > > Jon, does Michal's reply [1] address your concerns? > > Or should I respin and ask Andrew to pick it up? > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180712080006.GA328@dhcp22.suse.cz/ > > Michal acked #11 (the docs patch) in particular but not the series as a > whole. But it's the rest of the series that I was most worried about :) > I'm happy for the patches to take either path, but I'd really like an > explicit ack before I apply that many changes directly to the MM code... Andrew, Can you please take a look at this series? The thread starts at [1] and if it'd be more convenient to you I can respin the whole set. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1530370506-21751-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com/ > Thanks, > > jon > -- Sincerely yours, Mike. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html