From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8956E7D071 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389633AbeG0WxS (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:53:18 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:40656 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389583AbeG0WxS (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:53:18 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 601E630D; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:29:32 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] docs/mm: make GFP flags descriptions usable as kernel-doc Message-ID: <20180727152932.0ead76d1@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180727212720.GD17745@rapoport-lnx> References: <1532626360-16650-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1532626360-16650-7-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180726160825.0667af9f@lwn.net> <20180727212720.GD17745@rapoport-lnx> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:27:21 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > I won't insist on this, but I would suggest that, in this particular case, > > it might be better for that markup to come out. > > No problem with removing % signs, but the whitespace changes are necessary, > otherwise the generated html gets weird. The whitespace changes are fine - it's really just the % markup I was commenting on. Thanks, jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html