linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 06:57:52 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180810014636.GJ32374@eros>

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 11:46:36 +1000
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc> wrote:

> Thanks for clarifying.  My understanding is now; this is a case where
> checkpatch is too verbose and we do not actually need to add a specific
> license identifier to the documentation files (new or otherwise).  They
> get an implicit GPLv2.

The objective actually is to have SPDX tags in all files in the kernel.
That includes documentation, even though people, as always, care less
about the docs than they do the code.

As I understood it, the complaint with the tags you put in wasn't their
existence, it was your putting GPLv2+ rather than straight GPLv2.  In the
absence of information to the contrary, you really have to assume the
latter, since that's the overall license for the kernel.

Thanks,

jon

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-10 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09  5:23 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  5:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] docs: net: Fix various minor typos Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  5:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] docs: Separate and convert filter.txt to RST Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  5:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] docs: Judiciously use double ticks Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  5:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] docs: Remove filter.txt from the tree Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  6:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST Alexei Starovoitov
2018-08-09  7:27   ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-09  8:24     ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-08-10  1:46       ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-10 12:57         ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2018-08-10 17:51           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-08-11 11:50             ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-08-13 19:37               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-08-10 21:54           ` Tobin C. Harding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).