From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9B7D584 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726786AbeITWt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:49:27 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:46878 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726128AbeITWt1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:49:27 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA0D9866; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:04:58 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , Randy Dunlap , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] docs/core-api: add memory allocation guide Message-ID: <20180920110458.07d5a1c7@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180920042930.GA19495@rapoport-lnx> References: <1536917278-31191-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180920042930.GA19495@rapoport-lnx> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:29:30 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > Ping? > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:27:55PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As Vlastimil mentioned at [1], it would be nice to have some guide about > > memory allocation. This set adds such guide that summarizes the "best > > practices". > > > > The changes from the RFC include additions and corrections from Michal and > > Randy. I've also added markup to cross-reference the kernel-doc > > documentation. > > > > I've split the patch into three to separate labels addition to the exiting > > files from the new contents. > > > > v3 -> v4: > > * make GFP_*USER* description less confusing Sorry...but it's been less than a week. And this week has been ... busy ... Anyway, I've applied the set now, thanks. jon