From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE057D57F for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726594AbeI0Kod (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:44:33 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:60720 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726591AbeI0Koc (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:44:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8R4Oolh132689 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:28:19 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mrkun94k8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:28:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:28:17 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e17.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.204) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:28:13 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w8R4SCDM21692530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:28:13 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E710B2068; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:26:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA837B2065; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.180.198]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF9A416C3FCC; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:47:40 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Joel Fernandes Cc: LKML , Jonathan Corbet , Josh Triplett , Lai Jiangshan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [0/5] rcu doc updates Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20180925182601.37421-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18092704-0040-0000-0000-000004770948 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009778; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000267; SDB=6.01094226; UDB=6.00565617; IPR=6.00874261; MB=3.00023523; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-09-27 04:28:16 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18092704-0041-0000-0000-0000087F0EBB Message-Id: <20180926234740.GN4222@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-09-27_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=953 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809270046 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:49:10AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:26 AM Joel Fernandes (Google) > wrote: > > > > Hi Paul, > > These patches are documentation updates for the rcu_dynticks rolling into > > rcu_data and also the updates to the fact that there's a single rcu_state now. > > Its based on your rcu/dev branch. > > > > Next I'm thinking of tackling 'RCU Callback Handling' and further digging into > > the dyntick handling and then dig into other documents outside of > > Data-Structure that need updates. But let me know any suggestions. > > Thanks! > > Apologies that my scripts missed the 'PATCH' prefix. Hopefully that's > Ok for this time, but let me know if you'd like me to resend them! > Thanks! I will let it go this time. ;-) Queued, thank you very much! I will push them out when I get to a reliable network connection. I made a few adjustments to wording, so please double-check. You should be able to just diff against your original patches. Thanx, Paul