From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068187D08A
	for <lwn-linux-doc@archive.lwn.net>; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:31:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729159AbeKVHHs (ORCPT <rfc822;lwn-linux-doc@archive.lwn.net>);
        Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:07:48 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:55448 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726429AbeKVHHs (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:07:48 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version
        :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:
        Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:
        Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:
        List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
         bh=045HICJJn4lFtl8ezh0YLS2Wnlr4WooCucz847EazK4=; b=iHvfIKmNxp9JxGQV46iWtPeoV
        ks9+VAq/hKX4fdWsGRx5c6Omifd4qhqaUqT0iy7bfmrA/vdgVHGjvUa/0XTvD5UrjCU+6d6pnDapb
        5uExaBY25Lbkl7OirjCho6dKZTLNOYcIKLjycP85KLS0tSz3sv0ffNjimfgwuBKPXZ1Tf+yAY89Yx
        AhiYuPehKZebl+pipBdWPuTcMpuOCU/nppIUQ8YdTRB7qkJKbuGiqyNIi8vBT+VPCd/Se/TFHnBQy
        EsG82N+3pNAwmYHlKgafhm2d7nEIHOXji8XT4oLZvTLmBGLl9gYI5c+kbYPW4S43DDCmpyS82dGmW
        jtioCZoyQ==;
Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1gPZA6-0002zC-I2; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 20:31:50 +0000
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:31:50 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        timmurray@google.com, primiano@google.com, joelaf@google.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@gmail.com>,
        Prashant Dhamdhere <pdhamdhe@redhat.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        KJ Tsanaktsidis <ktsanaktsidis@zendesk.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add /proc/pid_generation
Message-ID: <20181121203150.GK3065@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <20181121201452.77173-1-dancol@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181121201452.77173-1-dancol@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-doc.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:14:44PM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> This change adds a per-pid-namespace 64-bit generation number,
> incremented on PID rollover, and exposes it via a new proc file
> /proc/pid_generation. By examining this file before and after /proc
> enumeration, user code can detect the potential reuse of a PID and
> restart the task enumeration process, repeating until it gets a
> coherent snapshot.
> 
> PID rollover ought to be rare, so in practice, scan repetitions will
> be rare.

Then why does it need to be 64-bit?