From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487B07D089 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 20:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730885AbeLNU6I (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:58:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:33024 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730757AbeLNU6I (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:58:08 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id z23so3263982plo.0; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nKn9yheUmyYNGOHtNqDCelwebCWGHkX+/pUrK3UVzM8=; b=dJWHLX2FpXTq8S4acSufbNHvMbzNb4p0GG6Ed48izfhGWPWK1oHzmm8ZsDxs92mGMr Jj+KmxM6oHj65FRaPcjYCEXWmPEZwVItcSv5BrVbNez6Zh8gKYim3rjY/axju+3hpiSH Yg6dvx5VFq6l2JoQ+/7iuXK5snmBD/d0LeaxpLW8oG9haHl3SFjjCA1y/AqiHj1KAXYT yDGnPdJvTTsi3kTlTpmBfvmwpa7ffYfvz8qXU+tiDsgDGRM2lGRktS2mutv93noIxov6 Kzbv66EznoQNG1OuQbehQN2RNUhNCyJvNksg0WiTQYc+ddxLNBBQRav29G1IVJ0uPxpu NCJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nKn9yheUmyYNGOHtNqDCelwebCWGHkX+/pUrK3UVzM8=; b=LRk2kd4dTt9yNvn4cH52enPztxNRpeI8fap2dovdheAhTTcuvxq+GHS6/0/EQcg+zL XQE1I5O8eUhAUR4IhDJ+PAk26yMLA7kfP1omlJG576IvkamVMhGsEgLe+lh1HFCDfWL+ eQxzYOt6+z6XbHRpzazApkhG9cauw2qraka5BcBuryGLfFfUpKmEU0aAv6tmmOlUZM5A cwDCfddFmmTIjI1vwTHqCNVwYolJHc2ujDlrR3FquLk+aodPb/MW7aDCY6AI5ZUaBl/O J8/2S3dzngWrvu+Je8s6pGxr7aGFyv9dNDSMV8ak99uYvJbXAEahEqVI9x97GQ1qi8vE lvvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYb6Qydz4jxoqna6ZlKfUtIYLHekJR/Nw1qqIgWPCgl1U8GEh+8 gEigVfZBFljPOljFjbiRQNc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VLOh89EnSalpSeo0xal3qwzpwuPo4L7brqqgRwlMOJJEBw6LlplkSXuEYB80SMB6owLwlrWw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:29ab:: with SMTP id h40mr4239467plb.238.1544821087915; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from himanshu-Vostro-3559 ([103.233.116.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a10sm7108659pfi.138.2018.12.14.12.58.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 02:28:00 +0530 From: Himanshu Jha To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz , joe@perches.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, apw@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, niklas.cassel@linaro.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: add Co-developed-by to signature tags Message-ID: <20181214205800.GA22639@himanshu-Vostro-3559> References: <1544808928-20002-1-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> <1544808928-20002-3-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> <20181214121634.1157f2302c8ba1825fc03ad2@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181214121634.1157f2302c8ba1825fc03ad2@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:16:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:35:28 +0100 Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote: > > > As per Documentation/process/submitting-patches, Co-developed-by is a > > valid signature. > > > > I'm with Joe - I find this tag kinda useless and duplicative. But whatever. I'm fine either way, just the problem is: Co-developed-by Vs Co-Developed-by with checkpatch spitting out that it is not a valid signature. In the end, I can completely remove the tag from docs if it is useless and duplicative. -- Himanshu Jha Undergraduate Student Department of Electronics & Communication Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology