From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B027D08E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 16:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732263AbfACQ2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:28:51 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:57164 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730795AbfACQ2u (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:28:50 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BF0C97D; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 16:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:28:49 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Otto Sabart Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix bad references to documentation files Message-ID: <20190103092849.48e14277@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 21:00:47 +0100 Otto Sabart wrote: > This series of patches fixes multiple warnings > from `$ make refcheckdocs` output. > > I am still not sure if it's good practise to send these changes in > a series (because they touch multiple trees) or as a single commit > because it is one "logical" change :). Definitely not as a single commit for something like this. It's a good practice to use the get_maintainer.pl script to figure out who should receive any given patch. In particular, the various device-tree patches should go to the device-tree maintainers, the SCSI one to the SCSI list, etc. I'll go ahead and apply patch 2 (the ext4 one) since it's a pure docs fix. For the rest, I'd suggest doing multiple mailings, being sure to get them to the right maintainers. Thanks, jon