Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] clk: clkdev add managed lookup registrations

[Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>]

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:38:37AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Russell King - ARM Linux admin (2019-01-31 07:21:47)
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:24:52PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:09:00PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > > Series adds managed clkdev lookup interfaces and cleans few drivers
> > > > 
> > > > Few clk drivers appear to be leaking clkdev lookup registrations at
> > > > driver remove. The patch series adds devm versions of lookup
> > > > registrations and cleans up few drivers. Driver clean-up patches have
> > > > not been tested as I lack the HW. All testing and comments if
> > > > driver/device removal is even possible for changed drivers is highly
> > > > appreciated. If removal is not possible I will gladly drop the patches
> > > > from series - although leaking lookups may serve as bad example for new
> > > > developers =)
> > > > 
> > > > Changed drivers are:
> > > > clk-max77686 and clk-st
> > > > 
> > > > Please note that the patch #2 requires this change to work correctly:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=05502bf9eb7a7297f5fa6f1d17b169b3d5b53570
> > > 
> > > I guess the dependency mentioned abowe is already in (most) of the
> > > trees. (I can't say for sure as I don't know what is the correct tree
> > > for clkdev - is it linux-arm.git as Russel is maintaining clkdev?
> > 
> > Yes, I'm supposed to be maintaining clkdev, but I'm busy with other
> > stuff (such as reorganising my network, helping people with SFP issues,
> > I'm supposed to be replying to Arend over a brcmfmac issue that has been
> > on-going since Christmas which I haven't yet been able to doing the next
> > test...)
> > 
> > > If yes, then the commit 05502bf9eb7a7297f5fa6f1d17b169b3d5b53570
> > > "clk: of-provider: look at parent if registered device has no
> > > provider info" seems to be sitting in maser branch).
> > 
> > It's there because it's part of the mainline kernel and has been
> > since v5.0-rc1.  So, if you depend on that commit, basing off
> > v5.0-rc1 is probably sane, unless there's something else that
> > conflicts.
> > 
> 
> I can pick up the patches in the clk tree. Clk drivers will be the users
> so it's probably simplest to merge the clkdev patch in clk tree and then
> consumers can be updated at the same time in a patch stack on top of
> that.

This sounds good to me if it is Ok to Russel. Please just let me know if
you want me to rebase (to clk-next?) and resend the series.

> Otherwise, if I can get a stable branch/tag to pile the clk driver
> patches on I can apply them that way and then the clkdev patch can go
> via Russell.

I can for sure go with this approach as well if it has some advantages
to you. Again, please just let me know if I should resend series and if
I should use something else but clk-next as a base.

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes.  Just then, he vanished ~~~