From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163567D08A for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726210AbfBBOcT (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 09:32:19 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33502 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725853AbfBBOcT (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 09:32:19 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x12ESZeh106020 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 09:32:18 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qd8kns706-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:32:18 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:16 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:13 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x12EWC8c35782774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:12 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64E55204E; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.205.162]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A8C52051; Sat, 2 Feb 2019 14:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:32:10 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" , "Tobin C. Harding" , Christopher Lameter , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] docs: Use underscore not hyphen in label References: <20190131040623.15569-1-me@tobin.cc> <20190131040623.15569-4-me@tobin.cc> <20190131092757.GF28876@rapoport-lnx> <20190131205608.GB1329@eros.localdomain> <20190201160310.5b98eb69@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190201160310.5b98eb69@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19020214-0008-0000-0000-000002BA3B0A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19020214-0009-0000-0000-000022264532 Message-Id: <20190202143209.GA8620@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-02_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902020120 Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:03:10PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:56:08 +1100 > "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > > > > > From: "Tobin C. Harding" > > > > > > > > sphinx emits warning > > > > > > > > WARNING: undefined label: memory-allocation ... > > > > > > Weird, for me it works fine. The generated html at kernel.org [1] also > > > seems to be Ok... > > > > > > What version of sphinx do you use? > > > > Thanks for looking at this Mike. I was running 1.4, I see there is a v2 > > out so I'll upgrade but if the warning doesn't show for you then I'd say > > we just drop this patch. > > > > Jon, > > > > Is it within your usual workflow to take just the first two patches from > > this series or would you like me to spin another version without the > > final patch in it? > > We currently document that 1.4 is supposed to work, so we should stick to > that; I think I'll go ahead and apply all three patches. > > We should maybe consider dragging our minimum version forward a bit, or > else we might want to document this particular gotcha. I have 1.4.6 (the one listed in sphinx.rst) and everything worked just fine... > Thanks, > > jon > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.